Assistant Alert

AuthorDavid L. Hudson Jr.
Pages24-25
Assistant Alert
Supervision is key to e ective employment of paralegals
By David L. Hudson Jr.
Attorney usage of para legals and
legal assista nts is a respected reality
in today’s legal climate . The Bureau
of Labor Statistic s reports there will be
a 15 percent increase in par alegal jobs
from 2016 through 2026—a rate it lists as “much fas ter
than average” compared to other profes sions.
Paralegals perfor m a litany of tasks—including draft-
ing documents, preparing att orneys for
trial and organ izing client fi les. The U.S.
Supreme Court also has weighe d in, writing
in Missouri v. Jenkins, a 1 989 school deseg-
regation case, that pa ralegals provide the
“cost-e ective delivery of legal service s.
However, attorneys must be aware of
ethical issues t hat can arise from using
paralegals and lega l assistants. Perhaps
the most direct ru le on point is Rule 5.3:
Responsibilities Regar ding Nonlawyer
Assistance i n the ABA Model Rules of
Professiona l Conduct. Among othe r
requirements, the rule ex plains that
lawyers must make rea sonable e orts
to ensure those working under them
comply with “professional obligations.”
The rule also expla ins that a lawyer who
has supervis ory authority over nonlawyers
is responsible for the ethical v iolations
committed by such nonlaw yers. Comment
2 to Rule 5.3 explain s: “A lawyer must give
such assistants appropri ate instruction
and supervision concer ning the ethical
aspects of their employment, pa rticularly
regarding the obligation not to disclos e
information relating to repres entation
of the client, and should be responsible
for their work product.”
JUGGLING ACT
Some ethics exper ts identify delegating
too much work to paralegals a s the No. 1
ethical concern for at torneys. The key is
to maintain a dequate supervision over
nonlawyer employees.
“The biggest minefi eld I see is
overworked or inattentive law yers
failing to provide adequ ate direc-
tion and supervision, leav ing the
paralegal to fi gure things out
on [their] own,” says Salt Lake
City lawyer Keith A . Call, who
has writt en about ethical issues involving paralega ls in
the Utah Bar Journal.
The process of delegating things th at are hard for
attorneys to fi gure out themselves is espe cially danger-
ous, Call says. “Under Rule 5.3, a law yer can be person-
ally responsible for the unethic al conduct of his or her
paralegal. A nd all too often, overworked or careless
lawyers can be t empted to dump too much responsibility
on the paralegal and fa il to follow up with
adequate superv ision,” he says.
A related concern is that at torneys might
give too much work to paralega ls or not real-
ize the paralegal s are actually practicing law.
Case reporters a re fi lled with complai nts
in which attorneys fa ced discipline—some-
times very serious di scipline—for allowing
their paralegals t o engage in the unauthorized
practice of law.
“While I thin k there is a problem with attor-
neys delegating to and not adequately super-
vising paralega ls, I think the bigger concern is
paralegals conducti ng themselves in ways that
could be considered the practice of law a nd
attorneys not reining th at in,” says Kellyn O.
McGee, a professor at Savanna h Law School.
“Paralegals have great k nowledge in the
areas of law that they work in,” she says,
adding that “it’s easy for them to g ive advice
or otherwise cros s the line and either not
realize that the y shouldn’t be doing it or
attorneys might believe it’s har mless.”
A speci c variant of this problem in some
r ms is paralegals signing up clients. “Some
law r ms allow paralegals to sign up new
clients,says ethics exper t Peter A. Joy, a
law professor at Washington University
in St. Louis. This can be a big prob-
lem because paralega ls cannot exercise
the independent legal judgment necessar y
to sign up a client, and sometimes par ale-
gals may be crossing the line by solic iting
cli ents .
Joy points out another area of concern
lawyers allowing pa ralegals to sign legal
documents.
One area that some lawyers ig nore
both with para legals and with
other support sta is permit-
ting someone other than a
lawyer to sign a pleadi ng or
any other court fi ling,” he
Ethics
24 || ABA JOURNAL JANUARY 2018
“I THINK
THE BIGGER
CONCERN IS
PARALEGALS
CONDUCTING
THEMSELVES
IN WAYS THAT
COULD BE
CONSIDERED
THE PRACTICE
OF LAW.”
— KELLYN McGEE
PHOTOGRAPH COURTESY OF SAVANNAH LAW SCHOOL
Practice

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT