Assessing a Proposal for Updating the Marxist Theory of Dependency

AuthorJaime Osorio
Published date01 January 2022
Date01 January 2022
DOI10.1177/0094582X211047906
Subject MatterArticles: Contemporary Theoretical Debates
https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211047906
LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES, Issue 242, Vol. 49 No. 1, January 2022, 153–165
DOI: 10.1177/0094582X211047906
© 2021 Latin American Perspectives
153
Assessing a Proposal for Updating the Marxist
Theory of Dependency
by
Jaime Osorio
Translated by
Mariana Ortega-Breña
A recent proposal for updating of the Marxist theory of dependency requires abandon-
ing the categories of superexploitation and unequal exchange and the theory of dependent
capitalism. Examination of the limitations of this proposal highlights the misconceptions
regarding these categories and the importance of recognizing dependent capitalism as a
form of capitalism for an understanding of the state of the revolution in Latin America and
the exceptional conditions that have made it possible for some economies to overcome
underdevelopment.
Una propuesta reciente de renovación de la teoría marxista de la dependencia reclama
abandonar las categorías superexplotación e intercambio desigual y la de capitalismo
dependiente. Un examen de las limitaciones de esta propuesta destaca a los errores en la
comprensión de esas categorías así como la relevancia de capitalismo dependiente como
una forma de capitalismo para comprender la actualidad de la revolución en América
Latina y las condiciones de excepción que han hecho posible superar el subdesarrollo por
algunas economías.
Keywords: Superexploitation, Unequal exchange, Dependent capitalism, Forms of cap-
italism, State of the revolution
No one should oppose a priori an updating of Marxism or, in particular,
Marxist dependency theory. Such a stance is akin to dogmatism and religious
belief. At the same time, an update that seeks to dilute its axiomatic founda-
tions is a dangerous proposition, the more so if the proponent suggests that this
is being done from within its core. This paper addresses the 2016–2018 (a; b; c;
d) writings of Claudio Katz on the background of dependency theories.1
Beyond its many interesting aspects, this work eagerly seeks to distance itself
from the core categories and viewpoints of the Marxist theory of dependency
under the banner of a theoretical revision, in particular with regard to the con-
cepts of superexploitation, dependent capitalism, and unequal exchange.2 I will
Jaime Osorio is a professor and researcher in the Department of Social Relations of the Universidad
Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco, and also teaches in the Graduate School of Latin American
Studies of the the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. His books include Fundamentos del
análisis social: La realidad social y su conocimiento (2001), Crítica de la economía vulgar: Reproducción del
capital y dependencia (2004), Estado, biopoder, exclusión: Análisis desde la lógica del capital (2012), and
Sistema mundial, intercambio desigual y renta de la tierra (2017). Mariana Ortega-Breña is a translator
based in Mexico City.
1047906LAPXXX10.1177/0094582X211047906Latin American PerspectivesOsorio / ASSESSING A PROPOSED UPDATE OF DEPENDENCY THEORY
research-article2021

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT