Asserting children's rights through the digital practices of transnational families
Published date | 01 April 2023 |
Author | Viorela Ducu,Mihaela Hărăguș,Daniela Angi,Áron Telegdi‐Csetri |
Date | 01 April 2023 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12828 |
RESEARCH
Asserting children’s rights through the digital
practices of transnational families
Viorela Ducu
1
|Mihaela H
ar
agus¸
2
|Daniela Angi
3
|
´
Aron Telegdi-Csetri
4
1
Centre for the Study of Transnational
Families, Faculty of Political, Administrative
and Communication Sciences and Faculty of
Sociology and Social Work, Babes¸-Bolyai
University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Centre for Population Studies, Babes¸-Bolyai
University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Faculty of Political, Administrative and
Communication Sciences, Babes¸-Bolyai
University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Centre for the Study of Transnational
Families, Faculty of Political, Administrative
and Communication Sciences, Babes¸-Bolyai
University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Correspondence
Viorela Ducu, Faculty of Sociology and Social
Work, Babes¸-Bolyai University, Anghel
Saligny Street, 400604 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Email: viorela.telegdi@ubbcluj.ro
Funding information
This article has been produced with the
financial assistance of the European Union,
contracted by ICMPD through the Migration
Partnership Facility: ICMPD/2021/MPF-
357-004. The contents of this article are the
sole responsibility of the authors at the Babes¸-
Bolyai University and can under no
circumstances be regarded as reflecting the
position of the European Union or ICMPD.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates how transnational fami-
lies function as advocates, channels, and iterators of chil-
dren’s rights in the context of digital communication.
Background: Transnational parents are involved in prac-
tices of doing family through digital copresence, in doing
rights toward society and coagency among family mem-
bers, creating a rights context.
Method: Data were collected in Moldova and Ukraine
through 102 semistructured interviews and 10 focus group
discussions with adults and children in transnational fami-
lies and caregivers, and 24 interviews with experts from
local and national authorities as well as NGOs.
Results: Transnational parents represent their children by
engaging in digital communication practices with institu-
tions and maintain family togetherness through involve-
ment and support of children within transnational family
relationships. Communication with institutions is bur-
dened by distrust of and constraints regarding information
and communication technologies (ICT) access, the limited
availability of adults as interlocutors for daily communica-
tion, and deliberate nontransparency of communication at
both ends.
Conclusion: Digital communication offers families the
capability to represent children’s rights externally, and to
create internal family togetherness as a potentially new
register of presence, articulated by the limits and specificity
of the mode of communication employed.
Author note: All authors have contributed equally to this article.Viorela Ducu ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6643-
6048Mihaela H
ar
agus¸ ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-1377Daniela Angi ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-
2608
´
Aron Telegdi-Csetri ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-1025
Received: 31 May 2022Revised: 28 September 2022Accepted: 15 November 2022
DOI: 10.1111/fare.12828
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
© 2023 The Authors. Family Relations published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Council on Family Relations.
458 Family Relations. 2023;72:458–477.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/fare
Implications: Inclusive digital communication capacities of
transnational family members necessary for the practice of
family togetherness, exercise of parental responsibilities,
and support for children’s participation should be
enhanced on both ends as well as within and without the
family.
KEYWORDS
children’s rights, digital copresence, participation, registers of presence,
transnational families, transparency of communication
Introduction
Transnational or multisited families refer to “families that live some or most of the time sepa-
rated from each other, yet hold together and create a feeling of collective welfare and unity,
namely ‘familyhood,’even across national borders”(Bryceson & Vuorela, 2002, p. 3). Transna-
tional family research has been motivated both by the concern toward the well-being of persons
engaged in transnational migration while maintaining family ties at a distance, as well as by the
new dynamics of their status.
However, as Greschke and Ott (2020) showed, the transnational family as a topic of
research has outgrown the above concerns and shows great promise as an exemplary entity for
understanding global society. Namely, they argued that transnational families succeed in bring-
ing together two essentially distinct aspects of human coexistence previously understood as com-
munity and society, that is, belonging and the participatory aspects of social life. Strategically,
this means that transnational family studies now stand as a central perspective in research on
migration and global society, not only as a subfield of the sociology of migration and of trans-
national sociology, but as an exemplary field of study in the sociological as well as normative
(rights-oriented) sense.
The present study is written as part of the CASTLE (Children Left Behind by Labour
Migration: Supporting Moldovan and Ukrainian Transnational Families in the EU) multina-
tional action research project, the main objective of which is to assess the needs and rights of
left-behind children in the two beneficiary countries (Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova)
and to formulate recommendations and enact action for their support. The CASTLE project
began in June 2021 and runs until December 2023 and is coordinated by the Babes¸-BolyaiUni-
versity (Romania). The Ukrainian Institute for Social Research after Oleksandr Yaremenko,
and the Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova are the academic partners in the project,
whereas the Terre des Hommes delegation in Romania, Terre des Hommes Ukraine, and Terre
des Hommes Moldova are civil society partners.
The analysis developed in this paper aligns with the general framework used in the CASTLE
project, where we examine the way in which the following rights stipulated by the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC; United Nations, 1989) are observed
in the context of children left behind through parents’labor migration:
•the child’s best interest (Article 3);
•the right to family integrity and maintaining relationships with family members (Article 9);
•a child’s right to maintain regular personal contact with both parents if they live in different
states (Article 10);
•the responsibility of both parents to raise the children (even from a distance), in correlation
with the obligation of parents to ensure the financial means for a decent standard of living
for the child (article 27); and
ASSERTING CHILDREN’S RIGHTS459
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
