Are the Effects of Legitimacy and Its Components Invariant? Operationalization and the Generality of Sunshine and Tyler’s Empowerment Hypothesis

DOI10.1177/0022427820926228
Published date01 February 2021
Date01 February 2021
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Are the Effects of
Legitimacy and Its
Components Invariant?
Operationalization and
the Generality of
Sunshine and Tyler’s
Empowerment
Hypothesis
Bryanna Fox
1
, Richard K. Moule, Jr.
1
,
Chae M. Jaynes
1
, and Megan M. Parry
2
Abstract
Objectives: To assess whether the relationship between legitimacy and police
empowerment is sensitive to the operationalization of legitimacy, and
whether the effects of legitimacy and its components on empowerment
are invariant. Empowerment is examined in the context of police militariza-
tion—public support for the discretionary use of surplus military equipment
by law enforcement. Method: Using a national sample of 702 American
adults and a series of ordinary least squares regressions, the direct and
interactive effects of legitimacy and its components on empowerment are
1
University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
2
University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
Corresponding Author:
Bryanna Fox, Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave.,
SOC 327, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Email: bhfox@usf.edu
Journal of Research in Crime and
Delinquency
2021, Vol. 58(1) 3-40
ªThe Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0022427820926228
journals.sagepub.com/home/jrc
examined. Results: The composite measure of legitimacy, as well as its
individual components, each exert direct effects on police empowerment.
Instrumental factors have persisting, albeit weaker, effects relative to
normative factors. Interaction terms between the composite legitimacy
measure or its components and sociodemographic characteristics were
not statistically significant. In short, the effects of legitimacy and its com-
ponents on empowerment appear invariant. Conclusions: Findings provide
additional evidence of the generality of Tyler’s process–based model and
extend these considerations to the burgeoning literature on public empow-
erment of police.
Keywords
empowerment, obligation to obey, police legitimacy, police militarization,
process-based model, trust in police
In democratic societies, institutional authorities derive their authority from
the public (Locke 1988; Sabine 1937). These authorities must work to
achieve and maintain legitimacy among those they serve, as it allows for
effective governance. This is especially true for the police (Tyle 2006).
Over the past two decades, a sizable body of research has explored the
process-based model, or the antecedents and consequences of police legiti-
macy. This research has focused primarily on the relationship between
procedural justice and legitimacy (Mazerolle, Antrobus et al. 2013; Tyler
2017; Wolfe et al. 2016) or two main consequences of legitimacy, compli-
ance with the law, and cooperation with police (Tyler and Jackson 2014;
Walters and Bolger 2018). Beyond compliance and cooperation, however,
Sunshine and Tyler (2003) identified a third possible consequence of legiti-
macy: empowerment. When the police are seen as more legit imate, the
public is suggested to be more willing to empower them or grant them
greater discretion, autonomy, and support in the furtherance of their duties.
A growing literature has begun to elaborate on the linkages between legiti-
macy and empowerment, with preliminary evidence indicating that greater
legitimacy increases public willingness to empower the police (see Moule,
Burruss, Parry, et al. 2019).
Despite evidence supporting the legitimacy–empowerment link, issues
remain in this literature. The current study focuses on two specific issues.
First, debates about the appropriate opera tionalization of legitimacy are
ongoing (Huq, Jackson, and Trinkner 2017; Jackson and Bradford 2019;
4Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 58(1)
Jackson and Gau 2016; Tankeb 2009), and the operationalization of legiti-
macy in empowerment research varie s considerably. Assessing whethe r
the legitimacy–empowerment relationship is sensitive to differences in the
measurement of legitimacy is thus necessary. Second, research finds the
effect of procedural justice on the components of legitimacy (trust in police
and obligation to obey) to be largely invariant across many sociodemo-
graphic characteristics (e .g., age, sex, and race; Wolf e et al. 2016). As
Sunshine and Tyler (2003:522, emphasis added) noted, it is “important to
consider whether the models being evaluated apply equally well to every-
one in a community. In particular, do the members of majority and minority
groups consider the same issues when evaluating the police?” Whether the
effects of legitimacy or its components have invariant effects on empower-
ment is unknown. Addressing the issues of operationalization and invar-
iance on the “back end” of the process-based model is necessary for further
establishing the generality of the theory (Aiello 2019; Jackson 2018; Wolfe
et al. 2016).
The process-based model is a pillar of police–community relations (Pre-
sident’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing 2015). Empowerment gets at
the heart of these relations as it recognizes the public’s ability to grant
police greater latitude to execute their duties. In the past few years, tensions
between the police and the public, particularly among minority community
members, have escalated into protests and civil unrest. The current study
focuses on one issue that emerged during this time: the acquisition and use
of surplus military weapons and equipment by police (Balko 2013; Kraska
2007). This topic is well-suited for examining empowerment, as it involves
discretionary police practices which may harm police–community relations
and civil liberties (President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing 2015).
Recent research has examined public support for police militarization (e.g.,
Lockwood, Doyle, and Comiskey 2018) but not whether legitimacy corre-
sponds with greater willingness to empower police for the members of
minority and majority groups. Overal l, evidence linking legitimacy and
empowerment, and of the generality of the process-based model, coupled
with Sunshine and Tyler’s explicit suggestion to test the applicability of the
theory across social groups, reinforces the importance of examining invar-
iance. Likewise, the potential harm that militarization may do to police–
community relations justifies a more in-depth assessment of public support
for this behavior.
To that end, the current study assesses whether legitimacy and its com-
ponents influence public empowerment of police, and whether these effects
are invariant across a variety of sociodemographic characteristics. Using a
Fox et al. 5

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT