Applying the Strategies of International Peacebuilding to Family Conflicts: What Those Involved in Family Disputes Can Learn from the Efforts of Peacebuilders Working to Transform War‐Torn Societies

Date01 July 2015
AuthorGuy Burgess,Heidi Burgess
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12166
Published date01 July 2015
APPLYING THE STRATEGIES OF INTERNATIONAL
PEACEBUILDING TO FAMILY CONFLICTS: WHAT THOSE
INVOLVED IN FAMILY DISPUTES CAN LEARN FROM THE EFFORTS
OF PEACEBUILDERS WORKING TO TRANSFORM WAR-TORN
SOCIETIES
Heidi Burgess and Guy Burgess
Intractable international conflicts and difficult or intractable family conflicts have much in common. Relationships are damaged
or destroyed, escalation causes parties to become polarized and make bad decisions, communication is strained or nonexistent,
and competition and coercion take the place of collaboration. Similarities also exist in the realm of solutions, and those caught
in (or intervening in) difficult family conflicts can learn much from the strategies and tactics of international peacebuilders.
This article describes eight steps that peacebuilders at both the family level and the international level can take to make very
damaging conflicts more constructive.
Key Points for the Family Court Community:
Limiting escalation is important in both contexts.
Preventing or correcting misunderstandings is key to resolution in both contexts as well.
Be sure you are focusing on the real problem(s).
Get the facts straight (and agreed upon) before making agreements.
Healing past wrongs is important for long term stability.
Working both within and beyond the zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) is essential in both contexts.
Working to improve relationships helps all parties and improves the outcome.
Keywords: Peacebuilding; De-escalation; Misunderstandings; Fact-finding; Unrightable Wrongs; Zone of Possible
Agreement (ZOPA); Relationships
INTRODUCTION
Fractals are those spectacular, mathematicallygenerated graphics that have the peculiar property
of repeating the same pattern no matter how far one zooms in or out. Somewhat surprisingly, the
many conflict processes that characterize human society exhibit fractal-like properties with similar
destructive dynamics playing out at all levels of society—from the interpersonal to the international.
The same is true for strategies for limiting destructive dynamics and promoting more constructive
alternatives.
This article highlights similarities between the steps that peacebuilders take in their efforts to
transform war-torn societies and the steps that family therapists, lawyers, and mediators might take
to bring families back from the kinds of terrible conflicts that can, on a very small scale, be compara-
bly devastating. Because each of these ideas is presented very briefly here, links to sources of more
information are provided, often from the online knowledge base Beyond Intractability (http://www.
beyondintractability.org).
These steps are presented in a sequential order that suggests that each step must be success-
fully completed before the next step can be undertaken. In practice, however, one virtually
never has the time to pursue such a stepwise approach. Instead, a more realistic goal is to
simultaneously try to make as much progress on each of these steps as possible. This requires a
continuing recognition of the many ways in which the steps interact with and depend upon one
another.
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, Vol. 53 No. 3, July 2015 449–455
V
C2015 Association of Family and Conciliation Courts

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT