Applying a Family Resilience Framework in Training, Practice, and Research: Mastering the Art of the Possible

Published date01 December 2016
AuthorFroma Walsh
Date01 December 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12260
Applying a Family Resilience Framework in Training,
Practice, and Research: Mastering the Art of the
Possible
FROMA WALSH*
With growing interest in systemic views of human resilience, this article updates and
clarifies our understanding of the concept of resilience as involving multilevel dynamic
processes over time. Family resilience refers to the functioning of the family system in deal-
ing with adversity: Assessment and intervention focus on the family impact of stressful life
challenges and the family processes that foster positive adaptation for the family unit and
all members. The application of a family resilience framework is discussed and illustrated
in clinical and community-based training and practice. Use of the author’s researc h-
informed map of core processes in family resilience is briefly noted, highlighting the recur-
sive and synergistic influences of transactional processes within families and with their
social environment. Given the inherently contextual nature of the construct of resilience,
varied process elements may be more or less useful, depending on different adverse situa-
tions over time, with a major crisis; disruptive transitions; or chronic multistress condi-
tions. This perspective is attuned to the diversity of family cultures and structures, their
resources and constraints, socio-cultural and developmental influences, and the viability
of varied pathways in resilience.
Keywords: Family Resilience; Resilience; Resiliency; Systems Approach; Trauma
Fam Proc 55:616–632, 2016
The concept of resilience has come to the forefront in the field of mental health and in
the developmental and social sciences. A growing body of research (Masten, 2014) has
enriched and expanded our understanding of human resilience as involving the dynamic
interplay of multilevel systemic processes fostering positive adaptation in the context of
significant adversity.
HUMAN RESILIENCE: A RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
A relational view of resilience assumes the centrality of relationships in human adapta-
tion. An abundance of research has revealed the importance of relationships in nurturing
and sustaining individual resilience (Walsh, 2016b). Most attention has focused on the
role of a significant bond and dyadic processes involving a primary parent, caregiver,
spouse, or mentor. A family systems orientation expands the lens to the broad relation al
network, attending to the ongoing mutuality of multiple influences and identifying poten-
tial resources for resilience throughout the immediate and extended family. A family
resilience practice approach (Walsh, 2016b) seeks to identify and involve members who
*Chicago Center for Family Health, School of Social Service Administration and Department of Psychiatry,
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Froma Walsh, PhD, Chicago Center for
Family Health, 20 N. Wacker Drive, #1442, Chicago, IL 60606. E-mail: fwalsh@uchicago.edu.
616
Family Process, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2016 ©2016 Family Process Institute
doi: 10.1111/famp.12260
areor could becomeinvested in the positive development and wellbeing of at-risk or
troubled youth or adults, believe in their potential, and support their best efforts to make
the most of their lives. In eldercare, both individual and family resilience are fostered by
expanding the lens from the role of the primary caregiver, often overburdened, to consider
many varied contributions of members in the family network and their involvement as a
caregiving team (Walsh, 2012).
A Family Resilience Framework: Core Principles
Beyond seeing individual family members and effective parenting/caregiving as
resources for individual resilience, a systemic perspective focuses on risk and resilience in
the family as a functional unit (Walsh, 1996, 2016a). Family resilience refers to the capac-
ity of the family system to withstand and rebound from adversity, strengthened and more
resourceful (Walsh, 2003). More than coping with or surviving an ordeal, resilience
involves positive adaptation, (re)gaining the ability to thrive, with personal and relational
transformation and positive growth forged through the experience. Overlapping with the-
ory and empirical evidence on Posttraumatic Growth (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004), resil i-
ence is distinct in focus on the transactional processes and pathways involved in this
growth. In the family systems field, numerous studies have found that couples and fami-
lies, through suffering and struggle, often emerge stronger, more loving, more purposeful
in their lives, and better able to meet future challenges (Walsh, 2016b).
The concept of family resilience extends family developmental theory and research on
family stress, coping, and adaptation (Hawley & DeHaan, 1996; Patterson, 2002). Building
on a substantial body of family systems research on transactional processes in well-func-
tioning families (Lebow & Stroud, 2012), it attends centrally to effective family function-
ing in dealing with adverse conditions. The concept is inherently contextual, with
strengths and vulnerabilities assessed and addressed in relation to a family’s challenging
situation.
A basic systemic premise is that serious crises and persistent life challenges impact the
whole family, and in turn, key transactional processes mediate adaptation (or maladapta-
tion) for all members, their relationships, and the family unit. Major stressors or a cascade
of stresses can derail family functioning, with reverberations throughout the relational
network. In facing adversity, the family approach and response are crucial for resilience.
Key processes enable the family to rally in highly stressful times to reduce the risk of dys-
function and to support positive adaptation. Although some families are more vulnerable
or have experienced severe trauma or persistent hardships, a family resilience perspective
is grounded in a deep conviction in their potential for repair and growth.
Ecosystemic and Developmental Perspectives
From a biopsychosocial systems orientation, risk and resilience are viewed in light of
multiple, recursive influences, involving an interaction of individual, family, community,
and larger system levels over time. Each family occupies a complex ecological niche, shar-
ing borders and common ground with other families, as well as differing positions with the
intersection of such variables as gender, economic status, life stage, ethnicity, and social
location (Falicov, 2012). Thus, each experience of adversity will have common and unique
features. A holistic assessment attends to the varied contexts, aiming to understand the
constraints and possibilities in each family’s position.
Ecosystemic perspective
As research was extended to a wide range of adverse conditions, it became clear that
resilience involves the dynamic interplay of multiple risk and protective processes over
Fam. Proc., Vol. 55, December, 2016
WALSH
/
617

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT