Antitrust Immunity for Shipping Conferences: An Empty Core Approach

AuthorWilliam Sjostrom
DOI10.1177/0003603X9303800208
Published date01 June 1993
Date01 June 1993
Subject MatterArticle
The Antitrust Bulletin/Summer 1993 419
Antitrust immunity for shipping
conferences: an empty core approach
BY WILLIAM SJOSTROM·
The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC), the Federal Trade
Commission, and the Department
of
Justice, responding to a
requirement in the U.S. Shipping Act of 1984, have recently
issued reports on the conference system in international ocean
shipping.' All three reports have raised the issue
of
antitrust
immunity for conferences, with the FMC report favoring antitrust
immunity and the other two opposed to it. The issue is also being
raised by the Advisory Commission on Conferences in Ocean
Shipping, which held hearings on the issue throughout the U.S. in
1991. A recent development in economics, the theory of the core,
College Lecturer, Department of Economics, University College
Cork, Cork, Ireland.
AUTIIOR'S NOTE: I am grateful for the comments and suggestions
of
John
Wiley and George Bittlingmayer.
1
FEDERAL
MAJUTIME
CoMMISSION,
SECTION
18
REPORT
ON
THE
SHIPPING
ACT
OF
1984 (Sept. 1989);
FEDERAL
TRADE
CoMMISSION,
AN
ANALYSIS
OF
THE
MARITIME
INDUSTRY
AND
THE
EFFECTS
OF
THE
1984
SHIPPING
ACT
(Bureau of Economics, Nov. 1989); U.S.
DEPARTMENT
OF
JUSTICE,
THE
DEPARTMENT
OF
JUSTICE
ANALYSIS
OF
THE
IMPACT
OF
THE
SWPPING
ACT
OF
1984 (Mar. 1990).
C 1993 by Federal Lelel Publicaliolll, Inc.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT