Antitrust Compliance in Action

AuthorCyrus V. Anderson
Published date01 December 1975
Date01 December 1975
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X7502000403
Subject MatterArticle
ANTITRUST
COMPLIANCE IN ACTION
by
CYRUS
V.
ANDERSON-
1.
PRELIMINARY
During
my association with
PPG
Industries, Inc. since
the end of
World
War
II,
I have
had
considerable dealings
with the subject of
antitrust
compliance. Indeed, as I shall
develop
later
in these remarks, in the
late
1940's my company
found
itself
in the somewhat unenviable position of having
to serve as a pathfinder in this
important
area
of activity.
As a result, in the intervening
years
Ihave
participated
in
a
number
of
gatherings
such as this
and
lectured on the sub-
ject, including
participation
in the
First
Annual Corporate In-
stitute
which was held here
thirteen
years
ago.'
Before
that,
in the
prior
ten-year period, I spoke frequently about
anti
trust
compliance
at
various
Practising
Law
Institute
pro-
grams-
and
elsewhere. Be
that
as it may, I find
that
the rudi-
ments of
antitrust
compliance have changed little in the
twenty-three
years
Ihave lectured on the subject outside of
my company."
During
the course of these remarks,
it
will be
apparent
to you, however,
that
the need
for
antitrust
compli-
ance
has
increased substantially
during
that
period;
more-
EDITOR'S
NOTE:
This
paper
was initially
prepared
for the 14th An-
nual
Corporate Counsel
Institute
held at Northwestern University
Law School. The eminence of the author in the field of
antitrust,
his
extensive experience with the subject of corporate compliance pro-
grams
and
the
quality
of this
paper
have encouraged the editors to
make one of their
rare
exceptions to
reprinting
addresses other
than
symposia.
Vice President, Law,
PPG
Industries,
Pittsburgh,
Pa.
ISee Anderson, Effective
Antitrust
Compliance Programs and
Procedures
(An
Outline), 18 Bus. Law 739 (1963).
2The theme of the first
PLI
program at which Ispoke was
Your
Pricing Problems
and
the
Antitrust
Laws, New York City, Decem-
ber 6, 1952.
a
For
that
reason, certain material used in
prior
addresses also
appears
here.
731
732
THE
ANTITRUST
BULLETIN
over, recent developments portend an even
greater
need for
compliance in the future.
It
should be emphasized
at
the outset
that
antitrust
com-
pliance as such is not a lawyer's function. As one commen-
tator
has observed:
Compliance is basically not a lawyer's function. At-
torneys can devise a sound program, can explain the law,
can check on compliance, and can even preach the gospel
of compliance. However, all of this is of no avail unless
businessmen want to comply.
Stated
differently, lawyers
cannot help clients who
are
unwilling to help themselves."
Rather,
antitrust
compliance is a function of management.
Bluntly stated, this means
that
any company's policy con-
cerning
antitrust
compliance
starts
with its chief executive
officer
and funnels down the line. There is strong support
for
that
view.
Compliance with
antitrust
laws is a management re-
sponsibility. Employees
at
all levels
are
responsible not
only
for
their own actions but for those of employees
under them. (Exxon Corp.)"
And, in the words of the
late
MarkW.
Cresap,
Jr.
(then
President of Westinghouse Electric Corporation) :
As a consequence of the Philadelphia cases, we have
embarked on a series of measures, as meaningful as we
can make them, to assure
that
nothing like this ever hap-
pens
at
Westinghouse in the future. We recognize, too,
that
strong
policy directives, extensive educational pro-
grams, certificates
and
affidavits of compliance,
and
strict
internal legal inspection,
are
not enough.
It
is essential,
in plain words, that the head man impress on the organi-
4. Withrow, Antit"ust Compliance Programs, 19 Record of N.Y.
C.B.A. 151, 158-9 (1964).
II Exxon Corporation, Antitrust Guide 1975, Foreward.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT