Antitrust and Inequality

AuthorShi-Ling Hsu
DOI10.1177/0003603X18756145
Published date01 March 2018
Date01 March 2018
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Antitrust and Inequality: The
Problem of Super-Firms
Shi-Ling Hsu*
Abstract
Increasingconcern about economic inequality has coincidedwith an unsettling ascendancyof some large,
technologically integrated “super-firms,” which have grabbed large market shares in multiple markets,
and cast doubtupon the future viabilityof a wide range of businesses, manyof which have been important
local and regional employers. It is thus unsurprising that these two trends have knocked together in
public discourse, and that antitrust law been proposed as one way of helping to remedy economic
inequality. Thisessay notes that antitrust law is generallya poor fit for reducing economic inequality,but
one aspect is worthyof note: an apparent increase in the capital-labor ratio in manyindustries, especially
in technological industries, where super-firms are predominant. An increase in the capital-labor ratio,
which is putatively efficient but which may have the effect of suppressing wages, coincides with an
increase in industrial concentration, suggesting that the overlap between antitrust law and economic
inequality is not the null set. This essay builds on the work of many antitrust scholars in calling for a
broader rangeof considerations in adjudicatingantitrust cases. The possibilitythat antitrust law is playing
a role in increasing the capital-labor ratio andchanging the structure of economies is dangerous enough
that some change in antitrust law is warranted to address foreseeable effects.
Keywords
antitrust, inequality, capital-labor, ratio
I. Introduction
As this sym posium issue recognizes, the areas of anti trust law and inequali ty have sometimes
knocked together in recent policy debates. From Thomas Piketty’s data -driven Capital in the
Twenty-First Century,
1
to J.D. Vance’s emotional Hillbilly Elegy,
2
to the 2016 presidential
*Florida State University College of Law, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Corresponding Author:
Shi-Ling Hsu, Florida State Universit y College of Law, Advocacy Center, Room A227C, 425 W Jeffe rson St, Tallahassee,
Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA.
Email: shsu@law.fsu.edu
1. THOMAS PIKETTY,CAPITAL IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY (A. Goldhammer trans., 2014; originally published as LE CAPITAL AU
XXI SIE
`CLE [2013]).
2. J.D. VANCE,HILLBILLY ELEGY:AMEMOIR OF A FAMILY AND CULTURE IN CRISIS (2016).
The Antitrust Bulletin
2018, Vol. 63(1) 104-112
ªThe Author(s) 2018
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0003603X18756145
journals.sagepub.com/home/abx

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT