Anticompetitive Conduct, Consumer Protection Matters, and Other Commission Activities

Pages153-186
153
CHAPTER V
ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT, CONSUMER
PROTECTION MATTERS, AND OTHER
COMMISSION ACTIVITIES
A. Part II Investigations
The staff of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC of Commission)
Bureau of Competition (BC) investigates conduct that may constitute an
“unfair method of competition” in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act
(as it relates to Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act),1 while the Bureau
of Consumer Protection (BCP) staff investigates whether conduct
amounts to an “unfair or deceptive act or practice” or violates one of the
numerous consumer protection statutes enforced by the agency. The
procedures for these investigations are contained in the Commission’s
Rules of Practice (FTC’s Rules or Rules) and do not vary depending on
which bureau conducts the investigation. However, nuances sometimes
arise in the purpose for which the bureaus employ a particular
investigative tool, or with respect to the frequency with which a
particular process is used, and, where appropriate, these differences are
noted below.
1.
Beginning an Investigation
The Commission may “gather and compile information” and
investigate “the organization, business, conduct, practices, and
management of any person, partnership, or corporation engaged in or
whose business affects commerce.”2 The Commission has delegated
limited authority to initiate investigations, without power of redelegation,
to the Director, Deputy Directors, Associate Directors of the BC and
BCP, and the Regional Directors and Assistant Regional Directors of the
Commission’s regional offices.3 Thus, the bureaus’ staff, rather than the
Commission, investigates matters in accordance with the FTC’s Rules.
1. Although less frequent, BC also investigates § 2 of the Clayton Act,
commonly known as the Robinson-Patman Act. See Chapter 2.A.2.a for
a discussion of the Robinson-Patman Act.
2. 15 U.S.C. § 46(a). Exceptions to this authority include banks and saving
and loan institutions. Id.
3. Id.
154 FTC Practice and Procedure Manual
Investigations may be triggered by (1) a request from the President,
Congress, government agencies, or the Attorney General; (2) referrals by
the courts; (3) a complaint by members of the public; or (4) the
Commission’s own initiative (e.g., based on press monitoring or
customer and competitor complaints).4
The Commission typically does not disclose the existence of an
investigation until it issues an administrative complaint, authorizes or
files a judicial complaint, announces a proposed settlement, or closes a
matter.5 The Commission may disclose the existence of an investigation,
however, if the target has publicly disclosed the existence of the
investigation, or if the practice has received substantial publicity so that
disclosure would not identify a target that has not already disclosed its
own identity.6
a. Complaints from Consumers and Competitors
Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or organization
may request that the Commission institute an investigation regarding any
matter under the Commission’s jurisdiction. The person or entity
making the request will not be regarded as a party to any proceeding that
may result from the investigation.7 Pursuant to Rule 2.2, consumer or
competitor requests should be in the form of a signed statement setting
forth the alleged violation of law with any supporting information and
the name and address of the person or persons who are the basis of the
complaint.8
For consumer protection-related issues, individual consumers may
file a complaint with the Commission by electronically registering a
complaint on the FTC’s Web site.9 Although the Commission does not
4. 16 C.F.R. §§ 2.1, 2.2.
5. Policy Concerning Disclosures of Nonmerger Competition and Consumer
Protection Investigations, 63 Fed. Reg. 63,477 (Nov. 13, 1998).
6. Id.
7. It is the general policy of the Commission to not publish or divulge the
name of the applicant or complaining party, except as required by law or
by the Commission’s rules. Where a complainant is a consumer or
consumer representative concerning a specific consumer product or
service, the Commission, in the course of the referral of the complaint or
of an investigation, may disclose the identity of the complainant or
complainants. 16 C.F.R. § 2.2.
8. Id.
9. See www.ftc.gov.
Competition and Consumer Protection Matters 155
resolve individual consumer complaints, consumer complaints help the
Commission determine whether law enforcement action is warranted.
Consumer complaints are typically entered into Consumer Sentinel, a
secure, restricted, on-line database that provides law enforcement
agencies access to hundreds of thousands of complaints regarding
identity theft, Internet and telemarketing scams, and other frauds.10 The
Commission also provides specific Web sites for complaints involving
violations of the Telemarketing Sales Rule (National Do Not Call
Registry), reports of identify theft, or complaints regarding an online
transaction involving a foreign company.11
Competitors may also submit a complaint to the Commission.
Though it is typically less expensive to submit a complaint to the
Commission than to file a lawsuit against a competitor, there is no
guarantee that the Commission will respond to the complaint because its
limited resources allow it to pursue only a small percentage of
complaints.
b. Referrals from Other Federal or State Agencies
and the National Advertising Division
Federal and state agencies as well as other organizations often work
closely with and refer matters to the FTC. One of the best-known
examples of this cooperative effort is the BCP’s long-standing
relationship with the National Advertising Division of the Council of
Better Business Bureau (NAD).12 The NAD is the advertising industry’s
self-regulatory body for resolving disputes over truth and accuracy in
national advertising. The NAD monitors and investigates national
10. Consumer Sentinel, http://www.consumer.gov/sentinel.
11. See www.donotcall.gov, www.ftc.gov/idtheft, and www.econsumer.gov.
12. See Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman, FTC, Remarks to the Council of
Better Business Bureaus: Self Regulatory Organizations and the FTC
(Apr. 11, 2005), http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/majoras/050411selfregorgs.
pdf; Pamela Jones Harbour, Commissioner, FTC, Remarks Before the
National Advertising Division: Helping the FTC Help You: Effective
Self-Regulation is Better Business (Sept. 26, 2005), http://www.ftc.
gov/speeches/harbour/ 050926selfreg.pdf; Orson Swindle, Former
Commissioner, FTC, Remarks Before the 2004 Joint Government Affairs
Conference, Advertising Issues Before the Federal Trade Commission
(Apr. 28, 2004), http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/swindle/040428aaf.htm;
Robert Pitofsky, Former Chairman, FTC, Remarks Before the D.C. Bar
Association Symposium: Self-Regulation and Antitrust (Feb. 18, 1998),
http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/pitofsky/self4.htm.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT