An Intersectional Analysis of Perceptions of Race in U.S. Prisons From Individuals Previously Incarcerated With Mental Illness

Published date01 September 2024
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241245719
AuthorAnthony Banks,Kelli E. Canada,Stacy Barrenger,Casey Bohrman,Anna Cox
Date01 September 2024
Subject MatterArticles
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, Vol. 51, No. 9, September 2024, 1358 –1377.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241245719
Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions
© 2024 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology
1358
AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF
PERCEPTIONS OF RACE IN U.S.
PRISONS FROM INDIVIDUALS
PREVIOUSLY INCARCERATED WITH MENTAL
ILLNESS
ANTHONY BANKS
KELLI E. CANADA
University of Missouri–Columbia
STACY BARRENGER
Northeast Ohio Medical University
CASEY BOHRMAN
West Chester University
ANNA COX
University of Missouri–Columbia
Despite efforts to reduce the number of people in the United States living in prison, people with mental illnesses continue to
be overrepresented in prisons. This study explores how race impacts the prison experiences of individuals with mental ill-
nesses. Thirty-seven participants were recruited from three states via flyers at community treatment providers and through
word of mouth. Participants completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews and surveys to understand prison experiences and
collect demographic information. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, framework method analysis, and an intersec-
tional lens. Findings show that participant experiences were influenced by race through interpersonal interactions between
those incarcerated and through interactions between people incarcerated and correctional staff. Intersectional identities
underlying these interactions were explored including race, socioeconomic status, rural versus urban residents, and subordi-
nate/dominant roles tied to power (e.g., staff vs. person incarcerated). These findings provide insight into how race, mental
illness, and criminal-legal contact intersect.
Keywords: race; ethnicity; prison; mental illness; intersectionality
In 2022, the United States continued to have the world’s highest incarceration rate with
573 per 100,000 people living in custody (Sawyer & Wagner, 2022). This incarceration
rate disproportionately impacts people of color, people living in poverty, and people
impacted by mental illness (MI) and substance use disorders. When these factors intersect,
incarceration rates increase (Baloch & Jennings, 2019; Ocen, 2013; Wang, 2022). Little
AUTHORS’ NOTE: This work was partially funded through the University of Missouri Research Board.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Anthony Banks, School of Social Work,
University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65201; e-mail: ajbnh9@umsystem.edu.
1245719CJBXXX10.1177/00938548241245719Criminal Justice and BehaviorBanks et al. / INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTIONS OF RACE
research-article2024
Banks et al. / INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTIONS OF RACE 1359
research examines the cumulative effect of multiple, intersecting identities on experiences
in prison (Batastini et al., 2022). The research that does exist suggests intersectional identi-
ties involving race, gender, and health can lead to increased discrimination and racism in
prison (Kilty, 2021). Understanding these experiences is important because incarcerated
people are highly subject to systematic injustice (Gilson, 2016). Failing to engage in an
intersectional approach may obscure needs and mask the differential impacts of prison
exposure (Cho et al., 2013). This project used intersectionality as an analytical framework
to explore how previously incarcerated individuals perceive their racial/ethnic identity,
urban/rural demographic identity, and overall positionality within the carceral setting influ-
ences their interactions between fellow incarcerated individuals and correctional staff.
MENTAL DISORDERS AND THE U.S. PRISON SYSTEM
People with MI continue to be overrepresented in the criminal-legal system despite
diversion programs. Prevalence rates of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders are
greater in state prisons compared with community samples (Prins, 2014). People with MI
have longer sentences than individuals without MI and tend to serve their entire sentence
(Comartin et al., 2020; Fellner, 2006). The prison environment has negative impacts on
mental and physical health during and following incarceration (Edgemon & Clay-Warner,
2018; Schnittker & John, 2007). Promoting positive mental health via programming and
services within prisons can help people with MI by increasing access to evidence-based
practices, specialized housing wings, and medications (Edgemon & Clay-Warner, 2018;
Semenza & Grosholz, 2019). Only half of individuals taking medication for MI in the com-
munity continue to receive treatment after entering prison (Gonzalez & Connell, 2014).
Individuals who were previously incarcerated also perceive barriers to accessing mental
health services, poor quality of mental and physical health services, inadequate staffing, and
arduous medical procedures as barriers to receiving mental health care (Canada et al., 2022).
RACE AND THE U.S. PRISON SYSTEM
Racial discrimination is deeply embedded in U.S. history. The social construct of race
has long been used as a tool for segregation and control and to perpetuate false arguments
based on innate biological differences (Bryant et al., 2022; Witzig, 1996). Segregation and
control are demonstrated post-slavery through the lynching of Black bodies as a weapon of
terror, Jim Crow laws in the American South to separate White from Black Americans,
redlining to prevent Black people from acquiring property and accruing wealth, immigra-
tion laws that specifically targeted and prevented Asian immigrants coming into the U.S.,
and mass incarceration (Mirken, 2020; Travieso, 2020). Jails and prisons are the “New Jim
Crow,” and a revision of slavery (Alexander, 2012; Gottlieb & Flynn, 2021; Schoenfeld,
2018). It is well established that people of color are imprisoned at disproportionate rates
compared with people who identify as White (Baloch & Jennings, 2019; Nellis, 2021;
Schnittker et al., 2011). Segregation continues in prison by gender, racial identity, and sex-
ual orientation (Dolovich, 2010; Furst, 2017; Hemmens & Stohr, 2014).
After the Supreme Court deemed racial segregation in prisons unconstitutional in 1968’s
Lee v. Washington, correctional staff found a way around this under the guise of prison
security (Hemmens & Stohr, 2014). Prison populations being segregated by racial/ethnic

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex