An Exploratory Study on the Role of Burnout and Devaluation among Staff in Psychiatric Correctional Facilities

Date01 February 2022
Published date01 February 2022
DOI10.1177/0306624X211010288
AuthorRobin Gearing,Berenice Pérez Ramírez,Lindamarie Olson,Luis R. Torres
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211010288
International Journal of
Offender Therapy and
Comparative Criminology
2022, Vol. 66(2-3) 249 –266
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X211010288
journals.sagepub.com/home/ijo
Article
An Exploratory Study on
the Role of Burnout and
Devaluation among Staff
in Psychiatric Correctional
Facilities
Lindamarie Olson1, Robin Gearing1,
Berenice Pérez Ramírez2,
and Luis R. Torres3
Abstract
Correctional staff work in demanding job environments that can lead to increased
burnout. Research aims were to determine the prevalence of burnout and devaluation
of consumers (i.e., individuals in their care) and their families among correctional
staff, examine associations between burnout and devaluation of consumers and their
families, and determine significant predictors of burnout. This exploratory study
investigated 30 correctional staff in a specialized psychiatric correctional facility for
individuals with mental illness in Mexico City. Correctional staff experienced low
to moderate burnout, reported high levels of devaluation of consumers (DCS), and
low levels of devaluation of consumers’ families (DCFS). The implications of burnout
on DCS and DCFS warrant large scale research and should compare burnout and
devaluation in specialized psychiatric correctional facilities versus general correctional
facilities.
Keywords
burnout, devaluation, mental health, correctional staff
1University of Houston, TX, USA
2Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacan, DF, Mexico
3The University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, USA
Corresponding Author:
Lindamarie Olson, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, 3511 Cullen Boulevard,
Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Email: leolson@uh.edu
1010288IJOXXX10.1177/0306624X211010288International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyOlson et al.
research-article2021
250 International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 66(2-3)
Introduction
Correctional staff operate in high-risk environments caring for individuals who may
exhibit hostility or have intense behavioral and mental health concerns, placing them at
risk for an increased likelihood of experiencing burnout. Burnout has been extensively
researched in human service sectors where direct contact and care is provided to clients
(Maslach et al., 2001; Schaufeli & Peeters, 2000), and there is evidence of high rates of
burnout among correctional staff (Griffin et al., 2012; Keinan & Maslach-Pines, 2007).
Research has examined the relationship between burnout among juvenile probation
officers (JPOs) and mental health stigma and competency (White et al., 2015). The
authors posit that mental health stigma may contribute to or intensify burnout among
JPOs and prevent them from attending fully to their client’s needs. This is important, as
the number of imprisoned individuals with mental illness continues to increase and
prisons currently lack adequate identification and treatment services for mental health
(National Alliance of Mental Illness [NAMI], 2020). As mental illness is overly expe-
rienced by imprisoned individuals (Treatment Advocacy Center, 2016), understanding
the association and implications between burnout and mental health stigma is critical to
provide adequate care for this population. This exploratory study focuses on the asso-
ciations of burnout and devaluation among correctional officers working in a specialty
prison for imprisoned individuals with serious mental illness.
Social Service Burnout
Initially, occupational burnout was operationalized as a process where a person fails,
becomes worn out or exhausted by making excessive demands on their energy,
strengths or resources (Freudenberger, 1974). This construct was extended by examin-
ing burnout among human services workers (Maslach, 1976). Specifically, Maslach
(1976) focused on emotional exhaustion resulting from work, and how it can lead to a
loss of respect or devaluing of clients. With this emotional strain, human service work-
ers may become detached or even cynical toward their clients (Cherniss, 1980).
Burnout was further expanded and conceptualized as a syndrome of emotional exhaus-
tion and cynicism that often emerges among individuals who work with others in some
sort of “people work” (Maslach & Jackson, 1984). Specifically, the authors posited
three main dimensions of the concept: emotional exhaustion (EE) recognizes the
importance of feeling drained or fatigued either mentally or physically from work;
depersonalization (DP) occurs when you begin to treat clients in an impersonal or
uncaring manner; and professional accomplishment (PA) relates to the feeling that you
may be making a difference through your work (Maslach & Jackson, 1984; Maslach
et al., 2001). In this conceptualization, high rates of EE and DP coupled with low rates
of PA are indicators of burnout.
Factors known to contribute to burnout include job demands and job resources such
as high caseloads and a lack of supervisor support (White et al., 2015). Burnout has
also been positively associated with turnover intent and absenteeism (Carlson &
Thomas, 2006; Lambert et al., 2010).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT