An empirical investigation of business‐to‐business e‐commerce adoption and its impact on SMEs competitive advantage: The case of Egyptian manufacturing SMEs

AuthorHatem El‐Gohary,Haseba Hamad,Ibrahim Elbeltagi
Published date01 May 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2196
Date01 May 2018
RESEARCH ARTICLE
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2196
Strategic Change. 2018;27(3):209–229. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jsc © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 209
Abstract
Business‐to‐business (B2B) e‐commerce adopon by Egypan manufacturing SMEs is an
important tool to gain compeve advantage. It is important to understand the levels of B2B
e‐commerce adopon among Egypan manufacturing SMEs and the dierent factors that inu
ence each level of such adopon. The Technology–Organizaon–Environment framework fac
tors have a signicant impact on the dierent levels of B2B e‐commerce adopon by Egypan
manufacturing SMEs. Technology–Organizaon–Environment framework factors have an indi
rect impact on Egypan manufacturing SMEs compeve advantage.

|

In developing countries as well as in developed countries, SMEs
makes a crical contribuon to the overall economy not only in terms
of employment and GDP (Ayyagari, Demirguc‐Kunt, & Maksimovic,
2011). In Egypt, 99% of registered enterprises are SMEs (Ghanem,
2013). Moreover, the SMEs sector is a major job provider, as it pro
vides around 75% of new jobs to the labor market. Moreover, Egyp
an manufacturing SMEs represent 99.7% of all manufacturing rms
within the country. However, despite aenon and iniaves from
academics, the iniaves taken by government and internaonal
organizaons to promote the adopon of e‐commerce, are sll very
limited as 68% of SMEs sll employ tradional and/or outdated lower
level technology, whereas 30% of SMEs use contemporary technology
and only 2% are on high‐level technology froner (El‐Mahdi, 2012).
By invesgang the related literature, it can be said that the study of
e‐commerce in Egypt, in general, is sll very limited and almost nonex
istent parcularly with regards to the dierent forms of e‐commerce
(e.g., business‐to‐business, B2B), e‐commerce and new technology
adopon (except from some studies related to e‐markeng and new
technology adopon by: Ahmed, Hay, & El‐Gohary, 2015, Eid & El‐
Gohary, 2013; El‐Gohary & Eid, 2012, 2013; El‐Gohary, 2009, 2010a,
2010b, 2011, 2012a, 2012b) and e‐commerce adopon and pracces
in manufacturing SMEs.
With regards to e‐commerce, it is dicult to nd one that is
well‐dened. For example, Baourakis, Kourgiantakis, and Migdalas
(2002) dene it as: “The trading of goods and informaon through the
Internet” (Baourakis et al., 2002, p. 581). Meanwhile, Zwass (1996,
p. 3) denes e‐commerce as an administrave and communicaons
tool: “The sharing of business informaon, maintaining business rela
onships, and conducng business transacons by means of tele
communicaons networks.” Meanwhile, Kim and Moon (1998, p. 2)
denes electronic commerce as “The delivery of informaon, products
and services, or payments via telephone lines, computer networks,
or any other electronic means,” Treese and Stewart (1998, p. 5) see
e‐ commerce as an opportunity in “The use of the global Internet for
purchase and sale of goods and services, including services and sup
port aer the sale.” More recently, Chaey (2007, p. 8) redenes it as
“All electronically mediated informaon exchanges between an orga
nizaon and its external stakeholders.”
According to Teeh and Burn (2001), regardless of how it is
dened, the main purpose of e‐commerce is to facilitate the exchange



Haseba Hamad123
1 Department of Administraon, Salahaddin
University, Erbil, Iraq
2 Plymouth Business School, Plymouth
University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
3 Faculty of Business, Law and Social
Sciences, Birmingham City University,
Birmingham, United Kingdom

Hatem El‐Gohary, Faculty of Business, Law and
Social Sciences, Birmingham City University,
UK ‐ College of Business & Economics, Qatar
University, Qatar ‐ Cairo University Business
School, Cairo University, Egypt.
Email: hatem.elgohary@bcu.ac.uk
* JEL classicaon codes: M10, M15 and M31.d
HAMAD et al.
210
of informaon and conducon of transacons. They also argue that
e‐commerce presents many opportunies for businesses regardless of
their size to improve its performance as well as its compeve advan
tage. It is also commonly recognized that e‐commerce is equivalent
to online buying and selling of products (goods and services). In the
narrow terms, e‐commerce focuses on conducng online transacons
between dierent pares over the Internet and/or other networks.
The view of e‐commerce as phenomena focusing on buying and selling
acvies is sll one of the most accepted views about e‐commerce
among researchers, business owners, marketers, and praconers
(El‐Gohary, 2010a, 2010b). E‐commerce plays a major role in today’s
economy and it is changing markeng and business pracces in a
dynamic way.
The purpose of this research is to add to the current knowledge
in the eld through lling one of the gaps in the literature by con
strucng and tesng a framework that claries the dierent factors
that aect B2B e‐commerce adopon as well as the dierent levels of
adopon and its impact on Egypan manufacturing SMEs compeve
advantage.

|

The main problem movang this research study is the need to
invesgate and examine the dierent factors that aect B2B e‐com
merce adopon by Egypan manufacturing SMEs. Both the technol
ogy–organizaon–environment (TOE) framework and the levels of
adopon model were used as underpinning theories to explain the
compeve advantage in manufacturing SMEs in Egypt. Structural
equaon modeling is used to validate the conceptual framework
through its applicaon on survey data regarding 260 manufacturing
Egypan SMEs.

|

Dissimilar to new ICT innovaons which oen happen suddenly, the
adopon and/or diusion of any new technology appear to be con
nuous and slow processes (Hall & Khan, 2003). Some researchers
have suggested that the most important factors to explain the adop
on of dierent forms of ICT in SMEs are the TOE factors (Chen,
Huang, & Lu, 2005; Kuan & Chau, 2001). As such, the TOE framework
had been employed and examined in many empirical research studies
and it was branded by its ability to explain the impact of the dier
ent factors that might aect IT adopon by SMEs in developing coun
tries (Ghobakhloo, Arias‐Aranda, & Benitez‐Amado, 2011; Lip‐Sam &
Hock‐Eam, 2011).
Accordingly, this research adopts the TOE framework as the
starng point theorecal framework to invesgate the dierent
factors aecng B2B e‐commerce adopon in SMEs in Egypt, with
a focus on the factors aecng each level of the adopon levels.
Moreover, in order to add more depth to the invesgaon, the study
examined the indirect relaonship between technological, organiza
onal, and environmental contexts and its relaon with and impact
on SMEs compeve advantage through the mediang role of B2B
e‐ commerce levels of adopon to idenfy which factors lead to which
type of compeve advantage.
B2B is considered as one of the main forms for e‐commerce.
Goodley and Lauchlan (2000), Kesselya (2000), and Torris, Condon,
and Omwando (2000) believed that B2B is not only the largest propor
on of the e‐commerce market but it also will acquire the majority of
the predicted future growth. Moreover, Chen (2001) illustrated that
B2B generates more revenue than business‐to‐consumer. This can
be both supported and jused by the benets that business rms
can acquire from B2B applicaons. With regard to B2B denion, it
is noted that it had been dened from many dierent points of view.
Within this regard, while the business diconary denes it as “trad
ing between rms characterized by relavely large volumes, com
peve and stable prices, fast delivery mes, and oen on deferred
payment basis” (Business Diconary, 2008a, p. 1), Baghdadi (2004,
p. 190) denes it as “businesses selling goods and services to other
businesses.” Moreover, Pinkston (2008, p. 1) denes B2B as “the pro
cess of employing informaon and communicaon technologies to
support the whole company value chain from suppliers through the
rm to customers.”
Both the technology–organizaon–environment (TOE) frame
work and the levels of adopon model were used as under
pinning theories to explain the compeve advantage in
manufacturing SMEs in Egypt.
Several studies invesgated the e‐commerce adopon (Pickernell
et al., 2013). There is a belief that the adopon of e‐commerce makes
a contribuon to the development of SME businesses in developing
countries (Ghobakhloo et al., 2011). This is because of its ability to
provide many benets including reducing costs, facilitang links to
global markets, and improving operaonal eciency. The WTO (2013)
reported that SMEs in developing countries would miss out on oppor
tunies in both protability and eciency if they did not employ IT in a
sucient and eecve way. It was idened that studies invesgang
the adopon of electronic commerce in SMEs were conducted in both
developed and developing countries. However, there was a higher
availability of literature in developed countries.
The research output in e‐commerce has been concentrated in
four main countries: Australia, the UK, Sweden, and New Zealand
(with a percentage of 15% of the total number of studies) (Tables 1–3).
These four countries had an early adopon for the Internet and web
technologies.
It was idened that studies invesgang the adopon of
electronic commerce in SMEs were conducted in both devel
oped and developing countries. However, there was a higher
availability of literature in developed countries.
Meanwhile, El‐Gohary (2009, 2010) reviewed arcles focused on
electronic commerce, electronic business, and Internet markeng (as
the largest of research areas covered by researchers and praconers
in the eld) and published from 2003 to 2009 (Table 4).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT