AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE WALL.

AuthorGochnour, Natalie

Trade policy will do more to stem illegal immigration than a border wall. Here's proof.

I find it helpful in public policy discussions to suspend emotion and learn from data and research. I can still return to my feelings afterwards, but my sentiments will then be informed by reason.

Do I want the borders fixed? Yes. Do I agree with the construction of an additional 550 miles of wall along the US-Mexico border? No, not all of it. I don't mind placing barriers in strategic locations, but I think there are better public policies to address this problem. The question is: how do we determine which policies make the most sense?

Public policies are difficult to evaluate. Policy ideas don't fit into a laboratory or petri dish so it's difficult to conduct a controlled experiment. Instead, we are left with empirical tools such as randomized control trials or observational data that allows us to conduct time series analysis, cross-sectional regression analysis, structural modeling, and other related methods. Fortunately, when it comes to border walls we have a connatural experiment of sorts: The Secure Fence Act of 2006.

The act passed Congress with large bipartisan majorities, including the support of Republican senators, Mitch McConnell and John McCain and Democratic senators, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. In accordance with the act, the Bush Administration constructed 548 additional miles of border fence between 2007 and 2010 at a cost of $2.3 billion. Largely because of that, 658 miles of the US-Mexico border has some sort of barrier.

Economists utilized statistical techniques to isolate the effect of this new fencing on migration flows and the economy. They used the Mexican government's Consular ID card database to do the analysis. The database includes information about unauthorized migrants who used the ID card to open bank accounts and send money through Western Union. Researchers constructed a migration flow database that revealed origins and destinations of migrants between Mexico and counties in the United States. They then combined the migration data with economic data from the US Census, American Community Survey, and the Mexican Census.

The results are fascinating.

"Overall, we find that the additional fencing had a very small effect on migration and an overall negative effect on the economy," said Stanford economist, Melanie Morten. Ms. Morten hails from the highly respected Stanford Institute for Economic Policy...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT