An American peace in Korea.

AuthorLee, Sung-Yoon
PositionWORLD WATCHER

WE OFTEN ARE REMINDED that the Korean War ended with an armistice. While that is an irrefutable fact, it is not true that the absence of a formal peace treaty is an impediment to peace in Korea. The signing of such a document between the U.S. and Noah Korea today would not facilitate, let alone guarantee, genuine peace or denuclearization on the Korean peninsula. To believe that it would only can be the result of a fundamental misreading of the Noah Korean regime--in terms of its nature and strategic intent.

It was on July 27, 1953, that the armistice bringing the Korean War to an end was signed. The war concluded without a clear victor and the Korean peninsula divided more or less along the same lines as at the beginning of the conflict on June 25, 1950. Despite the lack of a final resolution, the armistice made possible a long peace in Northeast Asia and planted the seeds of South Korea's freedom and prosperity.

In Noah Korea, on the other hand, July 27 has a different meaning. Pyongyang, its capital city, each year commemorates "the anniversary of the Great Victory of the Korean people in the Fatherland Liberation War." Noah Korea considers it a reminder of the unfinished business of communizing the entire Korean peninsula. The war may have ceased in 1953, but the Noah Korean revolution rages on. This fact helps explain the fundamental geopolitical dynamic on the peninsula.

In this light, consider Noah Korea's repeated demand for a peace treaty with the U.S. What explains its insistence on signing such a piece of paper with its "vanquished" foe? The answer is self-evident: to realize its goal of evicting U.S. forces from South Korea. Ever since Noah Korea joined the World Health Organization in 1973 and opened a diplomatic mission in New York the following year, it has been proposing bilateral peace negotiations with Washington. Of course, this did not stop it from sending assassins to kill South Korea's president, Park Chung Hee, or kidnapping its fishermen.

A peace treaty might be conducive to reconciliation between the two Koreas and stability in the region, but this will be the case only if it does not lead to calls for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from South Korea. What is more likely is that such an agreement would cause all sides (not only Noah Koreans, but South Koreans and Americans, too) to question the need for a continued U.S. presence in Korea, and this would, in turn, advance a top priority of the Noah Korean state: the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT