America's new enemy.

PositionThe 1994 crime bill - Editorial

America is in the grip of a crime scare. As in the Red Scare of the 1950s, the scariest part is that the enemy is among us, around every corner. Now as then, the Government uses the hysteria to justify taking harsh, expensive, and invasive measures in the name of public safety.

"Are we or are we not willing to put our votes where our speeches are and do something about the tide of crime and violence and fear that engulfs our nation?" Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell demanded before the final vote on the crime bill. Fear is the key word here, since the tide of crime and violence is actually going out. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the number of households touched by crime has declined 25 per cent since 1975. During the same period, the murder rate held remarkably steady. But fear is definitely on the upsurge.

The President's longing for a legislative victory, Congressional Democrats' desire to look tough, and media sensationalism around a few white, middle-class victims of crime--particularly twelve-year-old Polly Klaas in California and the passengers mowed down by a gunman on the Long Island Railroad--set the stage for the current wave of crime hysteria. Politicians of both parties are tripping over each other to lead the assault on America's new enemy--that personification of evil, the anonymous "criminal element."

The worst thing about the crime bill is that it represents a fundamental misapprehension about what makes us safe. A cop on every corner, harsher punishments, and more prison cells may sound like steppedup security, but, in fact, these measures do nothing to improve our neighborhoods or reduce crime over the long term.

Most of the money in the $30.2 billion crime bill will go to fund more of the same tried-and-failed, punitive policies of the last twenty years:

[paragraph] $9.85 billion to expand the prisons--a venture which has already driven several states to the brink of bankruptcy--will run out in six years, thus leaving states on their own to cover the costs of maintaining the increased prison population. Ten years ago, California spent 14 per cent of its state budget on higher education and 4 per cent on prisons. Today, both figures stand at 9 per cent. This shift in priorities has had a devastating impact on the state. Corrections spending is the second-fastest-increasing budget item in all states, trailing only Medicaid. Yet there appears to be no relationship between incarceration rates and crime...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT