AMERICA NEEDS 'LOW-SKILLED' WORKERS.

AuthorHarrigan, Fiona
PositionIMMIGRATION

AT A MOMENT when even modest immigration reform is politically contentious, several Republicans in Congress are open to letting in more "high-skilled" immigrants. But that approach overlooks the fact that the country would benefit from admitting workers at all skill levels.

"Skills-based immigration reform" is "essential to maintaining our national competitiveness," Sen. Todd Young (R-lnd.) said in March. "We want to encourage the best and the brightest from all over the world to be able to come here legally," Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) concurred in April.

Among Americans who believe the country should accept fewer immigrants, a 2019 Pew Research Center survey found, 63 percent still supported "encouraging highly skilled people to immigrate and work" here. "Selectionism," or deciding whom to admit "on the basis of promoting the national interest," Manhattan Institute President Reihan Salam argued in The Atlantic in June, could help "ambitious Republicans... assuage the concerns of their base." A central pillar of selectionist policy, Salam wrote, is "attracting superstar talent."

But "low-skilled" immigrants--those who work in factories, on farms, and in other largely manual fields--are also vital to American prosperity. What's more, admitting more of those immigrants could help alleviate some of the economic strain that everyday Americans face.

Reforming the H-2A visa program, which brings temporary agricultural workers to the U.S., could help address labor shortages plaguing American farms. The American Farm Bureau Federation notes that the program "provides less than 4 percent of the hired workers...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT