Alternate Food Markets, NGOs, and Health Policy: Improving Food Access and Food Security, Trust Bonds, and Social Network Ties

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.190
Published date01 June 2016
Date01 June 2016
Alternate Food Markets, NGOs, and Health Policy:
Improving Food Access and Food Security, Trust Bonds,
and Social Network Ties
Amy L. Best and Jeffrey L. Johnson
Limited access to healthy foods in low-income areas is well documented as part of “the new hunger”
in the United States. Characterized by easy access to nutrient-poor processed food and blocked access
to foods that secure dietary health and sustain well-being, “the new hunger” has been linked in
public health and social science literature to obesogenic environments, def‌ined as both food and built
environments that promote obesity. The paper examines how non-governmental organizations work
within distinct policy ecologies to improve food access and food security and promote community
health, focusing on one high-impact Mobile Farmers’ Market Program that was successful in
building community infrastructure to promote dietary health and improve food security at the
community level through improved food access. We offer this case study of a NGO–community
collaboration to better understand the role of formal and informal social networks between NGO
actors and different community stakeholders, including market customers, in communicating and
realizing city policy goals and positive program interventions in support of community health.
KEY WORDS: food security, food access, community health
Introduction: Policy Initiatives Toward “The New Hunger” in Washington, DC
Limited access to healthy foods in low-income communities is well docu-
mented as part of “the new hunger” in the United States. Characterized by easy
access to nutrient-poor, processed food, and blocked access to foods that secure
dietary health and sustain well-being, “the new hunger” has been linked in public
health and social science literature to obesogenic environments, def‌ined as both
food and built environments that promote obesity (Lake & Townsend, 2006).
According to the Capital Area Food Bank (2011), in Washington, DC, one in
three residents is at risk for hunger. As in other cities, hunger and poverty are
strongly related and are spatially patterned. Poverty prevalence is the highest in
District Wards 7 and 8. According to the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute (2012), over
30 percent of residents in these two wards lived below the poverty threshold in
2012. Despite the DC policy directive that “no neighborhood be unfairly exposed
World Medical & Health Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2016
157
1948-4682 #2016 Policy Studies Organization
Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ.
to health risks,” both dietary health and food insecurity correlate with high
neighborhood poverty concentration, thereby creating an “urban health penalty”
in terms of the distribution of health risk for these communities (Fitzpatrick &
LaGory, 2000, p. 6). In Wards 7 and 8 obesity prevalence hovers slightly below 40
percent (District of Columbia Department of Health, 2002). Residents in Wards 7
and 8 are disproportionately African-American, suggesting the demarcation of
urban space as a factor in health disadvantage is also a consequence of the legacy
of racial segregation in cities (Massey & Denton, 1998).
However, the health polic y landscape in Washington, DC has undergone
signif‌icant change in th e last decade, with health a nd well-being, equity and
diversity, and sustainability emerging as impor tant policy priorities. A compre-
hensive, city-wide move ment to address economi c, environmental, and health
issues in Washington, DC h as taken shape and has result ed in identifying a set
of sustainability goals as part of the 2011 D.C. Sust ainability Plan. “Universal
access to secure, nutritious, and affordable food supplies” was identif‌ied as a
key goal, with the specif‌ic target to ensure 75 percent of re sidents live within
one-fourth mile of healt hy and affordable food supp lies by 2032. To work
toward reaching these tar gets, the D.C. Sustainabil ity Plan called upon the
District to “create an ur ban food network to minimi ze food deserts and provide
local food within one half mi le of all District residen ts” (Sustainable DC Plan
2011, p. 19), noting that “lev eraging existing community networks and relation-
ships, the city can expand the ad option of sustainable practi ces through
strategic partnerships to advance community-wide goa ls. There are already
countless groups doin g groundbreaking work th roughout the District and some
are proving themselves t o be local and even national l eaders in sustainability”
(Sustainable DC Plan 201 1, p. 17).
A number of city initiative s to improve health and food acces s at the
community level are curre ntly underway in the Distric t. The Food Stamp
Expansion Act of 2009, which raised the qualifying levels for food assistance
and eliminated the asset mean s cap, enabled thousands more city residents to
gain access to food benef‌i ts, thereby addressing a substantial economic h urdle.
The Healthy Corner Stor e Program, a collaboration of D.C. Central K itchen, D.C.
Hunger Solutions, D.C .’s Department of Small a nd Local Business Devel opment
(DSLBD) and the city’s Depa rtment of Health and Communit y Health
Administration which p iloted in Wards 5, 7, and 8 pro vides assistance to
corner stores seeking t o sell fresh produce and hea lthy foods. The program is
designed to reduce food insecurity by improving the capac ity of corner grocery
stores in communities with limited supermarket access to p rovide healthier
food options, includin g fruits and vegetables, lower-fat snacks, and mor e
nutritious beverages, and thus ref‌lects an effort to a ddress geo-spatial
constraints (see D.C. Hu nger Solutions, 2008, 2016 ). Through the D.C. Food,
Environment,and Economic Development (FEED DC)Act of 2010, the District has
brought new food retail ers into communities whe re food insecurity is high an d
food access is constrai ned. Efforts to bring loca lly sourced fruits, veget ables,
and lean and/or sustainab ly farmed proteins to low-in come communities at
158 World Medical & Health Policy, 8:2

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT