ALJ Review Disability Benefits.

Byline: Derek Hawkins

7th Circuit Court of Appeals

Case Name: Mike Butler v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Case No.: 20-3187

Officials: EASTERBROOK, ROVNER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Focus: ALJ Review Disability Benefits

Mike Butler sought disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 401433, and that claim for benefits was denied by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) following a hearing. The Appeals Council declined to review the denial, and therefore the decision of the ALJ is the final decision for purposes of our review. Varga v. Colvin, 794 F.3d 809, 813 (7th Cir. 2010); 20 C.F.R. 404.955, 404.981. Butler now challenges the ALJ's determination that he was capable of doing light work with some restrictions, and that a sufficient number of such jobs existed that he could perform. The relevant time period at issue is from the alleged date of disability, November 4, 2015, through the ALJ's decision on April 19, 2018.

We review de novo the district court's affirmance of the ALJ's decision and review directly the decision of the ALJ. Id. The ALJ's decision will be affirmed if it was supported by substantial evidence, which is "'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'" Id., quoting Yurt v. Colvin, 758 F.3d 850, 856 (7th Cir. 2014). "An ALJ need not specifically address every piece of evidence, but must provide a 'logical bridge' between the evidence and his conclusions." Id., quoting O'Connor-Spinner v. Astrue, 627 F.3d 614, 618 (7th Cir. 2010).

On appeal, Butler argues that the ALJ failed to properly apply the grids in denying benefits. He alleges that in...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT