Alignment of knowledge management process with clinical process to support evidence based decision in healthcare improvements: The case of selected Ethiopian hospitals

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1654
Date01 January 2021
Published date01 January 2021
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
Alignment of knowledge management process with clinical
process to support evidence based decision in healthcare
improvements: The case of selected Ethiopian hospitals
Mniyichel Belay
1
| Amare Desta
2
| Steve Smithson
3
| Million Meshesha
4
1
Department of Information Science, Jimma
University, Jimma, Ethiopia
2
Professor of Information & Knowledge
Management, Queen Mary University of
London (QMUL), London, UK
3
Department of Management, London School
of Economics, London, UK
4
School of Information Science, Addis Ababa
University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Correspondence
Mniyichel Belay, Department of Information
Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Email: ethio2000mniyichel@gmail.com
This article aims to explore existing knowledge management (KM) process in
healthcare sectors and argues for an effective KM alignment with the clinical pro-
cesses. Basically, it discusses KM's processes such as knowledge capture, knowledge
store, and knowledge transfer to support decision making. This article uses an ethno-
graphic approach to studying the KM process in selected Ethiopian hospitals.
Methods include qualitative interviews with senior administrators and various levels
medical and administrative staff that record the existing ways of KM, knowledge pro-
cess, medical decision makers, and support of KM for a medical decision maker. It
include both primary and secondary data collected from health professionals in
selected hospitals. A semistructured interview was employed to acquire the required
knowledge from the selected domain. The findings highlight the weak trends of KM
in our sample hospitals. Our results articulated ways to improve KM processes,
increase the quality of health services, and support evidence-informed decision mak-
ing. This article recommends the need for a detail view of KM strategy/policy
supporting or assisting decision makers.
1|INTRODUCTION
Efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare need seamless knowledge
processes that enable and support decision making and interaction
between different actors within healthcare (Stefanelli, 2004).
Rexhepi (2015) also strongly argued that delivering effective and good
quality care is a complex endeavor that is highly dependent on medi-
cal knowledge.
As stated by Farlex (2012), medical knowledge is the body of
information about diseases, mechanisms and pathogenesis, thera-
pies and interactions, and interpretation of lab tests, which is
broadly applicable to decisions about multiple patients and public
health policies. Similarly, it includes an understanding of all
established and evolving biomedical, clinical, epidemiological, and
social-behavioral sciences (Nejim, 2016). The different authors
also pointed out the applicability of medical knowledge in clinical
processes healthcare. Nejim (2016) also argues that the acquisition
of medical knowledge should continually circulate back to the
application of it and provide better and more relevant, quality
patient care.
Nowadays, health sectors are knowledge-intensive environments
involving rapidly changing medical technologies and requiring tools,
skills, and methods with more knowledge resources (Hyun-Sook,-
2017). Similarly, Figurska and Sokół(2014) report that knowledge as
a strategic resource and its competent management is becoming
increasingly important for the competitiveness of the health sector.
Moreover, Shnhoras (2007) note that health sectors require a highly
divergent set of activities, such as providing healthcare, testing, diag-
nosis and treatments, as well as understanding complicated decision-
making processes with managing knowledge.
In healthcare, knowledge management (KM) is seen as a key fac-
tor in realizing and sustaining organizational success from improved
efficiency and innovation (Alawneh, 2009). It is being developed
mainly in the domain of electronic health record management and
health organization management. But healthcare KM raises different
challenges and issues due to its nature (Abidi, 2008). Similarly, KM is
Received: 7 September 2020 Accepted: 18 October 2020
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1654
Knowl Process Manag. 2021;28:310. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/kpm © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 3

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT