Afghanistan: Hard Choices and the Future of International Law

AuthorJohn F. Murphy
PositionProfessor of Law, Villanova University School of Law
Pages79-107
IV
Afghanistan: Hard Choices and the
Future of International Law
John F. Murphy1
AsIbegan my work on this article, the news out of, and the commentary
about, Afghanistan was grim. For example, aUnited Nations human rights
team has reportedly found "convincing evidence" that ninety civilians, including
sixty children, were killed in airstrikes on avillage in western Afghanistan. 1Ac-
cording to aTime magazine article:
There has been adramatic series of recent attacks by the Taliban: amass assault on jail
freed hundreds of prisoners, and a suicide bombing outside the Indian Embassy on
July 7killed 40 and injured over 100. Many ofthese assaults are planned and supported
from safe havens across the border in the tribal areas ofPakistan. Western casualties are
climbing; the last two months exceeded the monthly death toll in Iraq. On July 13, nine
U.S. soldiers were killed when Taliban fighters swarmed over their base in the eastern
province of Kunarthe worst attack in three years.2
In response to the Taliban attacks from the tribal areas of Pakistan, President
George W. Bush has reportedly authorized attacks by US special operations forces
against the Taliban in Pakistan.3This in turn has precipitated astrong protest from the
newly elected Pakistani government of Asif Ali Zardari, including apromise by Paki-
stan's top army officer to defend the country's sovereignty "at all costs."4
*Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.
Afghanistan: Hard Choices and the Future ofInternational Law
There are also recent claims that Afghanistan has become a"narco-State."5Ac-
cording to these claims, Hamid Karzai, the President of Afghanistan, and the
Afghan government are deeply involved in
protecting the opium tradeby shielding it from American-designed policies. While it
is true that Karzai's Taliban enemies finance themselves from the drug trade, so do
many of his supporters. At the same time, some of our NATO allies have resisted the
anti-opium offensive, as has our own Defense Department, which tends to see
counternarcotics as other people's business to be settled once the war-fighting is over.
The trouble is that the fighting is unlikely to end as long as the Taliban can finance
themselves through drugsand as long as the Kabul government is dependent on
opium to sustain its own hold on power.6
Even if one would not go so far as to agree with arecent statement by aEuropean
diplomat with substantial experience in Afghanistan that Afghanistan is "in its
worst shape since 200 1,"7it seems clear that the United States and its allies are cur-
rently facing serious challenges in Afghanistan. It is also clear that many of the chal-
lenges raised by developments in Afghanistan constitute major challenges to
international law and international institutions. The thesis of this article is that
these challenges will require the United States and other members of the world
community to make hard choices that will significantly affect the future of interna-
tional law.
Iwill begin with adiscussion of the backdrop to the current crisis in Afghani-
stan, starting with the events that led to the invasion by US and allied forces in
200 1.In this section, as well as in subsequent sections ofthis article, the focus is pri-
marily, but by no means exclusively, on issues of the jws ad bellum, the law of resort
to the use of armed force; the jus in bello, the law regulating the way the armed force
is employed, i.e., the law of armed conflict; and international human rights. Iwill
also explore some issues ofgovernance, the roles of the United Nations and NATO,
problems created by the use of the tribal areas in Pakistan by the Taliban and al
Qaeda as asafe haven, and the impact on Afghanistan of the current unstable polit-
ical situation in Pakistan.
The Backdrop
It may come as asurprise to some in light ofthe highly negative images ofAfghani-
stan created by the reign of the Taliban that Afghanistan enjoyed substantial peri-
ods of stability and enlightened governance.8The period of stability began after
King Amanullah Khan (1919-29) launched attacks on British forces in Afghani-
stan shortly after taking power and won complete independence from Britain, a
80

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT