Affect Toward Transgender People, Political Awareness, and Support for Transgender Rights

AuthorPhilip Edward Jones,Amy B. Becker
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221090488
Published date01 May 2022
Date01 May 2022
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221090488
American Politics Research
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X221090488
journals.sagepub.com/home/apr
Article
In the years since the landmark decision in Obergefell v.
Hodges (2015) to legalize same-sex marriage across the
U.S., a shift in attention toward transgender rights has come
to define the agenda of the broader LGBT movement (Hackl
et al., 2016) and opened a “new front” in the culture wars
(Castle, 2019; Haider-Markel et al., 2019). A group that has
historically been marginalized in the struggle for LGBT
rights is now at the forefront of the movement for change
(Taylor et al., 2018).
Concurrent with this shift, research has focused on
explaining attitudes on transgender issues (see Haider-
Markel et al., 2019 for a review). Scholars highlight values
like partisanship, religiosity, egalitarianism, and authoritari-
anism (e.g., Castle, 2019; Jones et al., 2018); views of gender
roles and experience with discrimination (e.g., Becker &
Jones., 2020; Flores et al., 2020); and interpersonal contact
with transgender individuals (e.g., Tadlock et al., 2017).
Alongside these factors, attitudes toward transgender
rights follow a pattern of “group-centric” reasoning common
to other policy issues (Conover, 1988; Nelson & Kinder.,
1996). On this account, citizens’ policy attitudes are derived
at least in part from their affect toward “the social groups they
see as the principal beneficiaries (or victims) of the policy”
(Nelson & Kinder., 1996, p. 1056). In line with this theory,
research shows respondents with positive views of transgen-
der people are more supportive of their rights (Lewis et al.,
2017; Jones et al., 2018).
Importantly, making the link between views of a group
and attitudes on policies that affect their rights takes some
understanding of politics, which not all citizens possess to
the same degree. In this research note, we show that political
awareness strengthens the link between feelings toward
transgender people and support for their rights. It is the most,
not the least engaged, who are most likely to rely on group
affect to determine their policy preferences.
Political Affect and Group-Centric
Politics
Affect toward social groups looms large in explanations of
American public opinion (e.g., Converse, 1964; Conover,
1988). When policy issues are clearly connected to a particu-
lar social group, “how much people like or dislike a group
should strongly affect how sympathetic or hostile they are to
the group’s cause” (Conover, 1988, p. 64). Those with warm
feelings toward a group are likely to support policies that
benefit them; those with negative affect prefer policies that
do harm (Nelson & Kinder., 1996; Jones et al., 2018; Lewis
et al., 2017).
1
090488APRXXX10.1177/1532673X221090488American Politics ResearchJones and Becker
-
article2022
1Political Science and International Relations, University of Delaware,
Newark, DE, USA
2Department of Communication, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore,
MD, USA
Corresponding Author:
Philip Edward Jones, Political Science and International Relations,
University of Delaware, 347 Smith Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Email: pejones@udel.edu
Affect Toward Transgender People,
Political Awareness, and Support for
Transgender Rights
Philip Edward Jones1 and Amy B. Becker2
Abstract
As with public opinion on other policy issues, attitudes toward transgender rights are partly driven by “group-centric”
reasoning. Those with more positive feelings toward transgender people are more likely to support policies that protect their
rights. But linking group affect with policies impacting members of that group requires some knowledge and understanding
of politics, which not all citizens possess to the same extent. In this research note, we demonstrate that political awareness
moderates the relationship between affect toward transgender people and support for their civil rights. ANES data from
2016 and 2020 show that more politically sophisticated respondents were more likely to connect their views of transgender
people with policies that protect their rights. These results suggest that group-centric thinking is most prevalent among the
most, not least, politically aware.
Keywords
affect, transgender rights, political awareness, group-centric politics
2023, Vol. 51(1) 76–80

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT