Addressing Culture, Gender, and Power with Asian American Couples: Application of Socio‐Emotional Relationship Therapy

AuthorYuwei Wu,Jessica ChenFeng,Lana Kim,Carmen Knudson‐Martin
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12251
Published date01 September 2017
Date01 September 2017
Addressing Culture, Gender, and Power with Asian
American Couples: Application of Socio-Emotional
Relationship Therapy
JESSICA CHENFENG*
LANA KIM
YUWEI WU
CARMEN KNUDSON-MARTIN
Asian Americans juggle the intersections of multiple social identities and societal dis-
courses as they respond to experiences of immigration, marginalization, and patriarchy,
integrate collectivist and individualistic family values, and form families and intimate
relationships. In this study we examine what we have learned as we apply Socio-Emotional
Relationship Therapy (SERT) with heterosexual couples of Asian heritage. SERT begins
with sociocultural attunement and the assumption that relationships should mutually
support each partner. Drawing on case examples, we illustrate how we practice sociocul-
tural attunement as couples respond to the relational processes that comprise the Circle of
Care (mutual influence, vulnerability, attunement, and shared relational responsibility).
We emphasize three key socioemotional themes that intersect with gender: (1) intangible
loss; (2) quiet fortitude/not burdening others; and (3) duty to the family.
Keywords: Asian American; Couples Therapy; Attunement; Gender; Power ; Culture
Fam Proc 56:558–573, 2017
Couple and family therapists are increasingly aware of the need for socioculturally
attuned practice (Falicov, 2009; Pandit, ChenFeng, Kang, Knudson-Martin, & Huen-
ergardt, 2014). A key challenge is to not stereotype or essentialize members of an ethnic or
cultural group, while also drawing upon knowledge of the sociopolitical context and issues
of gender, power, and privilege (Almeida, Hern
andez-Wolfe, & Tubbs, 2011). Socio-
Emotional Relationship Therapy (SERT) is an approach that takes this position. It begins
with sociocultural attunement and works from a model of mutual support and equality
that challenges the effects of societal-based power processes (Knudson-Martin & Huener-
gardt, 2010, 2015; Knudson-Martin et al., 2015). In this study we explore how we apply
these practices in our work with North American heterosexual couples of Asian heritage.
We share our observations from our locations as cisgender heterosexual women with
clinical and research interests in Asian populations (e.g., ChenFeng, Knudson-Martin, &
Nelson, 2015; Kim, Knudson-Martin, & Tuttle, 2014). Jessica, Lana, and Carmen were
part of the clinical research group that developed and studied SERT. Jessica is
*Educational Psychology and Counseling, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, CA.
Marriage, Couple, and Family Therapy, Counseling Psychology, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR.
Counseling Psychology, Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jessica ChenFeng, Educational Psychol-
ogy and Counseling, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA
91330. E-mail: jessica.chenfeng@csun.edu.
558
Family Process, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2017 ©2016 Family Process Institute
doi: 10.1111/famp.12251
second-generation Taiwanese American, born and raised in southern California. Lana is
second-generation Korean Canadian, born and raised in Canada. Yuwei is a Chinese
national studying family therapy in the United States. Carmen is a European American
with Scandinavian roots.
SOCIOCULTURAL ATTUNEMENT AND THE SERT APPROACH
The SERT approach involves three phases that build upon each other: (I) establishing
an equitable foundation for therapy, (II) interrupting the flow of power, and (III) facilitat-
ing alternative experience (Knudson-Martin & Huenergardt, 2015).
Phase I: Establish an Equitable Foundation for Practice
SERT therapists begin with the assumption that multiple societal discourses give
meaning to experience and suggest appropriate behaviors (Dickerson, 2014; Knudson-
Martin & Huenergardt, 2010; Krolokke & Sorensen, 2006). In any given context people
draw on multiple societal discourses and perform culture in different ways. What is salient
and meaningful varies from context to context and across time (Monk, Winslade, & Sin-
clair, 2008). Moreover, culture is always in an ongoing process of evolution and change
(Falicov, 2009).
We define Asian American broadly. The couples in this article represent a variety of
intersecting social positions and contexts, shaped in part by whether they are 1st, 1.5, or
2nd generation. They are persons of Asian ethnic descent who may identify with the cul-
ture of their ethnic heritage to some degree, and share the experience of being influenced
by dominant North American culture. Their identity is negotiated in a society that views
them as “other.” Although it is helpful to be aware of shared societal discourses within a
community, we try to attune to what it means to each person to identify as Asian Ameri-
can and help them be more aware and intentional regarding their responses to societal
messages.
We practice sociocultural attunement from the premise that emotion arises within par-
ticular societal contexts (Knudson-Martin & Huenergardt, 2010; Sarbin, 2001). Em otion is
embodied as neural responses to societal experience (Siegel, 2001). Humans need recipro-
cal attunement to feel safe and valued (Fishbane, 2007; Porges, 2009). Inequities related
to intersecting societal contexts such as social status, patriarchy, and racism and traumas
related to loss, war, and migration affect reciprocal attunement. Creating an equitable
foundation for change in couple therapy requires that therapists first “get” or resonate
with each client’s socioemotional experience, not only to understand but also to establis h
safety and openness to the process of relational engagement (Knudson-Martin & Huener-
gardt, 2010).
Phase II: Interrupt Inequitable Power Processes
Power is a fluid, dynamic process through which people influence and atten d to one
another. Power differences are built into social roles and identities and create differential
opportunities, access to resources, and expectations about what one is entitled to (Lesli e &
Southard, 2009; McDowell & Fang, 2007). Invisible and latent power is structured into
the way gender is constructed (Knudson-Martin, 2015; Komter, 1989; Mahoney & Knud-
son-Martin, 2009) such that male needs, interests, and desires frequently receive more
attention (Knudson-Martin, 2013). While maintaining emotional support and con nection
with each partner, therapists seek to interrupt inequitable flows of power and enable
alternative experience based on mutual support.
Fam. Proc., Vol. 56, September, 2017
CHENFENG, KIM, WU, & KNUDSON-MARTIN
/
559

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT