Actors and Actorhood in Institutional Theory

AuthorGerardo Patriotta
Date01 June 2020
Published date01 June 2020
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12558
© 2020 Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Actors and Actorhood in Institutional Theory
Gerardo Patriotta
University of Warwick
ABSTRACT Concepts of actors and actorhood, and different interpretations of these concepts,
underlie many debates in institutional research. The three Point-Counterpoint articles presented
here seek to reflect on what actorhood means in institutional theory. They offer thought-provok-
ing perspectives on the relationship between human agency and the normative arrangements
underpinning institutional behaviour.
Keywords: actors, actorhood, cognition, communication, institutional theory, phenomenology
INTRODUCTION
Debates on institutions in organizational analysis have been longstanding and, despite
the diversity of perspectives, they have been generally informed by an effort to explain
the interaction between human agency and the normative structures underpinning insti-
tutional behaviour. The three Point – Counterpoint articles presented here seek to reflect
on what actorhood means in institutional theory. More specifically, they ask: How do
people experience institutions? How do they internalize and enact particular institutional
arrangements? How they construct and communicate the institutional orders they are
part of ?
The article by Voronov and Weber (2020) argues for putting people at the centre of
understanding and evaluating institutions. The authors develop a phenomenological
perspective on actorhood that fully acknowledges the ‘humanity’ of persons, conceived
as ‘humans with a reflective capacity and sense of self, who engage with multiple insti-
tutions through the performance of institutional roles’. The authors maintain that other
perspectives on micro-foundations are limiting, conceptually and normatively, because
they reduce human beings to actors, entities that are constituted as roles within a particular
institution, and imply either a duality of institution and actor, or the complete absorption
Journal of Man agement Studi es 57:4 June 2020
doi:10. 1111/j om s.1 25 58
Address for reprints: Gerardo Patriotta, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL,
United Kingdom (Gerardo.Patriotta@wbs.ac.uk).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT