Today's accounting standards: how can anyone keep up?

AuthorCunningham, Colleen
PositionPresident'sPAGE

As I write this, the first "season" of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 reports for accelerated filers with December year-ends has just ended. The early reviews of the disclosures of material weaknesses (which were reported by about 6 percent of filers) have estimated that about 30 percent of the material weaknesses relate to personnel issues. This includes poor segregation of duties, as well as a lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate qualifications.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

At first blush, this appears to me to be a staggering statistic. However, as I contemplate the proliferation of extraordinarily complex financial accounting standards over the past few years, this should not be surprising. Who can possibly have appropriate qualifications to comprehend and implement standards such as FAS 133 and FIN 46?

Prior to Sarbanes-Oxley, companies had to rely on the expertise of a handful of technical accounting gurus at their audit firm's national office to help understand the implementation issues associated with these new standards. Now, if a company does not have a technical expert on staff to understand every intricacy of pension accounting (FAS 106), income tax accounting (FAS 109), derivatives (FAS 133) and FIN 46 (variable-interest entities), they have a material weakness. Not to mention having the capability on staff to recite the 180 different pieces of literature associated with revenue recognition.

AICPA Studies Differential Accounting

At the same time that the Section 404 reports were being issued by public companies, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)'s task force on private companies issued the results of its study on differential accounting standards. The institute surveyed 3,709 users, auditors and preparers, asking about the relevance and usefulness of 12 particular areas of financial reporting, including pension accounting and stock compensation. Not surprisingly, the study determined that much of this was not useful. As a result, the AICPA came to the conclusion that current U.S. GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) is not necessarily useful for private companies.

FEI's Committee on Corporate Reporting (CCR), which consists of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT