ABA midyear meeting. Native Rights

AuthorAmanda Robert, Lee Rawles
Pages62-63
ABA Insider | ABA MIDYEAR MEETING
neys in places where they are complying
with state and local laws.
The resolution “simply urges Con-
gress to take action in the form of the
SAFE Banking Act or similar legislation
that would make clear that federal
depository institutions can take money
from legitimate cannabis industries
in states that have chosen to legalize
the substance without fear of federal
prosecution,” said resolution co-author
Adrian Snead, a member of the TIPS
Cannabis Law and Policy Committee
and an associate at Holland & Knight
in Washington, D.C.
Michael Drumke, chair of the TIPS
Cannabis Law and Policy Committee
and a co-author of both resolutions,
said lawyers should be able to represent
cannabis clients without fear they will
be targeted for their work.
He noted that prosecutions against
attorneys are not unheard of.
In 2017, San Diego attorney Jessica
McElfresh faced felony charges in con-
nection with representing a marijuana
business. The charges were dropped in
2018. “It’s not really a clear system,”
Drumke, a shareholder at Swanson,
Martin & Bell in Chicago, said in an
interview. “You’re not supposed to aid
and abet the commission of a federal
crime. But under the model rules, clients
are entitled to representation.”
Paul Larkin, a senior legal research
fellow with the conservative Heri-
tage Foundation, said moves to shield
lawyers and banks do not tackle the
“fundamental issue” surrounding the
legal sale of cannabis. “I think what we
need to do is decide as a society if we
are going to legalize cannabis and how.
If we’re going to legalize it, there’s no
need for an exemption for banks and
lawyers,” he said in an interview.
Big business
The legal cannabis industry is proj-
ected to be worth $30 billion by 2025,
according to New Frontier Data, a rm
that provides analysis on the industry.
In January 2018, Jeff Sessions, Pres-
ident Donald Trump’s rst attorney gen-
eral, repealed the Cole Memorandum, a
President Barack Obama-era policy that
directed the Justice Department not to
prosecute cases in the states where mar-
ijuana is legal. Last year, William Barr,
Sessions’ successor, said he supports a
softer approach to cannabis enforce-
ment and changes to federal laws.
Still, uncertainty has beset nancial
institutions. In 2014, the Department
of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforce-
ment Network issued guidance under
the Bank Secrecy Act clarifying how
banks should do business in the legal
cannabis industry. “Unfortunately, this
did not provide sufcient safety for
many nancial institutions,” the report
accompanying Resolution 103D said.
Last year, the U.S. House of Repre-
sentatives passed the Secure and Fair
Enforcement Banking Act of 2019. The
bill, still pending in the Senate at press
time, would clear the way for banks
to open accounts for marijuana busi-
nesses without fear of prosecution, the
report says, and help prevent the money
laundering that can arise from “off-the-
books cash transactions.” Q
ABA MIDYEAR MEETING
Native
Rights
Voting access and protection
against violence for Native
Americans should be top
priorities, ABA House says
BY AMANDA ROBERT
AND LEE RAWLES
Ahead of this year’s presiden-
tial election, the ABA House
of Delegates overwhelmingly
passed a pair of resolutions
that aim to increase voter participation
and minimize voter suppression.
Resolution 112, submitted for the
ABA Midyear Meeting by the Section
of Civil Rights and Social Justice, urges
jurisdictions to remove barriers for
Native Americans and Alaska Natives
by providing equal access to voter
registration and polling sites; treating
tribal identication cards the same as
state and local identication cards;
notifying and obtaining consent from
tribal leaders before moving or closing
registration or polling locations on their
lands; and providing adequate language
assistance to voters.
There are 573 federally recognized
tribes and hundreds of state-recognized
tribes in the United States, and accord-
ing to the 2010 census, 5.2 million peo-
ple self-identied as American Indian
and/or Alaska Native, per the report
accompanying the resolution.
A study by the National Congress
of American Indians, also cited in the
report, showed that 34% of Ameri-
can Indians and Alaska Natives are
not registered to vote, versus 26.5%
of non-Hispanic whites. In addition,
according to the study, an estimated 1.2
million eligible Native Americans could
be missing from the voter rolls.
Mark Schickman, a delegate from
the Civil Rights and Social Justice
Section and of counsel with Freeland
Cooper & Foreman in San Francisco,
spoke in favor of the resolution. He
pointed out that Native Americans were
not recognized as citizens until 1924,
did not have the right to vote until
1948 and were not guaranteed the right
to vote in every state until 1962.
“Ever since then, they have been fac-
ing challenges to the right to vote,” he
said, citing “challenges to ID cards not
being adequate, literacy issues and in-
terpretation issues,” and long distances
to travel to vote or even register to vote.
The resolution also urges the federal
government to provide tribal leaders
access to federal election observers;
require the Department of Justice to
consult annually with tribes on voting
issues; and establish a Native American
Voting Rights Task Force under the Jus-
tice Department to provide grant funds
to increase voter education, registration
and participation in tribal communities.
ABA JOURNAL | APRIL-MAY 2020
62

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT