“A Matter of Long Centuries and Not Years”: Du Bois on the Temporality of Social Change
Published date | 01 April 2024 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231195584 |
Author | Jennie C. Ikuta |
Date | 01 April 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231195584
Political Theory
2024, Vol. 52(2) 289 –316
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00905917231195584
journals.sagepub.com/home/ptx
Article
“A Matter of Long
Centuries and Not
Years”: Du Bois on
the Temporality
of Social Change
Jennie C. Ikuta1
Abstract
In light of the summer 2020 protests and their subsequent backlash, questions
about the prospective timeline for achieving a racially just society have taken
on renewed significance. This article investigates Du Bois’s writings between
1920 and 1940 as a lens through which to examine the temporality of social
change. I argue that Du Bois’s turn to the role of white unreason explains
the dual temporality of his political vision and the dual strategies that ensue.
According to Du Bois, white supremacy is upheld not only by ignorance,
but also by white unreason, reproduced through generations of institutional
conditioning. Du Bois therefore turns to propaganda for transforming white
unreason, thereby making a racially just society possible. But because the
transformation of white unreason through propaganda is a slow process,
Du Bois argues that Black Americans must ensure their survival through
voluntary self-segregation. By presenting us with a framework of social
change, Du Bois models how advocates of racial justice might navigate
defeat without devolving into defeatism.
Keywords
Du Bois, temporality, social change, white unreason
1University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA
Corresponding Author:
Jennie C. Ikuta, Truman School of Government and Public Affairs, University of Missouri-
Columbia, 409B Jesse Hall, Columbia, MO, USA.
Email: jcikuta@missouri.edu
1195584PTXXXX10.1177/00905917231195584Political TheoryIkuta
research-article2023
290 Political Theory 52(2)
“No revolution happens within one lifetime so we work to capacity,
we believe in what we are doing knowing full well we won’t see the
fruits of our labor.
It is a hard place to hold.” —Audre Lorde, Dream of Europe
Introduction
In the wake of the murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, uprisings spread
like wildfire across the nation as multiracial crowds took to the streets to
protest police killings of Black Americans. Such protests were nothing new,
of course. Since the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement in 2013,
demonstrations to protest the killing of Black Americans have proliferated.
This time, though, things felt different. Not only were these uprisings larger
and more multiracial than before, but they were also framed in terms of a
broader “racial reckoning” that went beyond challenging police brutality to
challenging the systemic racism of which brutality is one expression (Chang
2020; Horowitz et al. 2020; Shyong 2020). Support for Black Lives Matter
surged (Cohn and Quealy 2020). Protestors tore down Confederate statues
(Taylor 2020). Anti-racism reading lists were disseminated online and white
readers clamored for books such as Ibram Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist
and Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility. Corporations—including those with
lackluster records for supporting racial justice—issued statements of solidar-
ity and collectively pledged $50 billion to support efforts for racial equity
(Jan et al. 2021). Taken together, these developments were optimistically
interpreted—by journalists and academics alike—as proof that this time,
things really were different. White Americans were finally waking up to the
reality of white supremacy and were motivated to do something about it. A
racially just society seemed more nearly in reach than ever before.
Just one year later, however, support for Black Lives Matter has precipi-
tously declined to levels even lower than those prior to Floyd’s death; this
decline is the result of rapidly plummeting support from white Americans
and Republicans, despite high levels of support from racial minorities
(Chudy and Jefferson 2021; Page, Elbeshbishi, and Quarshie 2021).
Moreover, of the $50 billion that corporations pledged in support of racial
equity efforts, less than one percent has so far actually been donated (Jan
et al. 2020). Moreover, a white insurrectionist mob stormed the Capitol on
January 6, 2021, in an effort to overturn the results of a national election in
which the outcome was decided by voters in cities with substantial Black
populations, such as Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Atlanta. Nor was it
To continue reading
Request your trial