J

AuthorBruce R. Hopkins
ProfessionLeading authority on the law of tax-exempt organizations
Pages233-236
J
J
jeofaile
A“jeofaile”isamistakemadebyalawyer,usuallyinthecourseoflitigation,andadmittedto
a court, such as by amendment to a pleading. This type of admission is infrequent.
jeopardizing investment
Aprivate foundati on cannot (without inc urring one or more sanctions) invest a ny amount
(income or principal)inamannerthatwouldjeopardizethecarryingoutofanyofitstax-
exempt functions (IRC §4944(a)(1)); investments of this nature are known as “jeopardizing
investments.” The statutory law is silent as to what constitutes this type of investment, other
than to exclude the program-related investment from the concept of j eopardizing invest-
ments. The tax regulations, however, state that an investment is considered to jeopardize the
carrying out of the exempt purposes of a privatefoundation if it is determined that the founda -
tion managers, in making the investment, failed to exercise ordinary business care and pru-
dence, under the facts and circumstances prevailing at the time the investment was made, in
providing fort he long-and short-term nancial needs of the private foundation to carry out its
exempt purposes. No categoryof investments is treated as a per se violation of these rules; how-
ever, the regulations list types or methods of investment that are scrutinized closely to deter-
mine whether the foundation managers have met the requisite standard of care and prudence.
[PF Chap. 8, §§ 1.4(g), 2.4(d), 15.1; EO §12.4(d); HC §5.10; SM pp. 89, 90].
jeopardy assessment
The IRS has the authority to make a “jeopardy assessment” in the income tax,estate tax,and
gift tax contexts (IRC §6861). This authority is triggered when the IRS determines that the
assessment or collection of a deciency i n one or more of these taxes wi ll be jeopardiz ed
by delay; this is accomplished by an immediate assessment of the tax(es) due, together with
interest, additional amounts, and additions to tax, coupled wit h a notice and demand for the
amounts due.
Bruce R. Hopkins’ Nonprot Law Dictionary, First Edition. Bruce R. Hopkins.
©2015 Bruce R. Hopkins. Published 2015 by John Wiley& S ons,Inc.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT