Disciplinary Case Summaries
| Publication year | 2010 |
| Pages | 155 |
| Citation | Vol. 39 No. 7 Pg. 155 |
2010, July, Pg. 155. Disciplinary Case Summaries
July 2010
Vol. 39, No. 7 [Page 155]
The summaries of disciplinary case Opinions and Conditional Admissions of Misconduct are prepared by the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge (PDJ) and are provided as a service by the Colorado Bar Association (CBA). The CBA cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the summaries.
The full text of the disciplinary Opinions, when published by the PDJ, follows the summaries page(s). The summaries and full-text Opinions also are accessible from the CBA website: www.cobar.org (click on "Opinions/Rules/Statutes"). Opinions, including exhibits, complaints, amended complaints, and summaries, also are available at the PDJ website, www.coloradosupremecourt.com/PDJ/pdj.htm, and on LexisNexis.®
Summaries of Decisions Regarding
Conditional Admission of Misconduct Issued by the PDJ
The PDJ's approval of a Conditional Admission of Misconduct does not result in a written Opinion but only a brief Order, which does not constitute precedent. Conditional Admissions of Misconduct are public record and are available for review at the Office of the PDJ, 1560 Broadway, Ste. 675, Denver, CO 80202; (303) 866-6658; www.coloradosupremecourt.com/PDJ/pdj.htm. They also are available on LexisNexis.®
No. 10PDJ051. People v. Januzzi. 05/19/2010. Attorney Suspended Ninety Days.
The PDJ approved a Conditional Admission of Misconduct submitted by the parties and suspended Kristopher Januzzi, attorney registration number 40419, from the practice of law for ninety days, with the requirement of respondent successfully completing reinstatement proceedings pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.29(c) through (e). The suspension was effective May 19, 2010.
In October 2009, the People learned from the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney Discipline that respondent had been convicted of driving while ability impaired in Larimer County Court on March 2, 2009. Respondent failed to timely report this conviction to the People (within the requisite ten days).
Respondent subsequently disclosed his failure to timely report a December 1, 2008 guilty plea to a public disturbance charge in Denver County Court. In that case, respondent failed to complete the conditions of his deferred judgment and sentence, and the court issued a...
To continue reading
Request your trial