Of Elections, Religion, and Lawyers
Publication year | 2005 |
Pages | 21 |
Citation | Vol. 34 No. 2 Pg. 21 |
2005, February, Pg. 21. Of Elections, Religion, and Lawyers
Vol. 34, No. 2, Pg. 21
The Colorado Lawyer
February 2005
Vol. 34, No. 2 [Page 21]
February 2005
Vol. 34, No. 2 [Page 21]
Features
CBA President's Message to Members
Of Elections, Religion, and Lawyers
by Steve C. Briggs
CBA President's Message to Members
Of Elections, Religion, and Lawyers
by Steve C. Briggs
The great dangers to liberty lurk in
insidious encroachment by men of zeal,
well-meaning but without understanding
insidious encroachment by men of zeal,
well-meaning but without understanding
- Justice Louis D. Brandeis1
Much has been written about the role "moral values"
supposedly played in the last election. Some have concluded
that religion should be blamed for polarizing our citizens
Others are concerned that those in power will use government
to favor one religion over another. These conclusions and
concerns, as well as some underlying assumptions, deserve
closer scrutiny
Of Religion and the Last Election
Because of a single exit poll, much has been written about
"moral values" as the "dominant" concern
in the last election.2 Many have assumed that "moral
values" were code words for the viewpoint of the
"Religious Right," and then concluded that this
viewpoint dominated in the last election. Despite what you
may have read in the press, neither the assumption nor the
conclusion is necessarily true.
First, only 22 percent who participated in the exit poll in
question listed moral values as their primary concern,
slightly more than those who listed the economy or
terrorism.3 Second, another poll, taking a closer look at the
values issue, showed that moral values was not necessarily a
catchphrase for Religious Right values, such as opposition to
abortion and gay marriages. In this poll, 33 percent of
respondents identified "greed and materialism" as
the most pressing moral issue facing the nation. Thirty-one
percent listed "poverty and economic justice." Only
12 percent named same-sex marriage. In response to another
question, 42 percent said the war in Iraq was the "moral
issue" that most influenced their vote. Only 13 percent
cited abortion and 9 percent listed same-sex marriage.4
Certainly, a small segment of voters who identify strongly
with a single issue can be determinative in an otherwise
evenly divided election. This does not make that single issue
"dominant," nor does it mean that the single issue
is lacking in its own complexities. To jump to the conclusion
that religion was the dominant issue in the last election is
to prove once again that, for every complex phenomenon, there
is a simple explanation that is wrong.
Of Evangelical Christians and
Stereotyping
Stereotyping
Of more concern is a possible underlying assumption that is
more invidious: evangelical Christians are united in trying
to take control of government and use its power to help them
impose their views on others. At work here is an unfair
stereotype.
Just as "moral values" was an undefined, vague term
in discussions after the last election, so was
"evangelical Christian." In North America,
"evangelical" does not have a unique meaning that
is acceptable to all. As one religious scholar has noted:
-Various individuals define it as a specific conservative
Christian system of beliefs, or a religious experience, or a
commitment to a proselytizing activity, or as a style of
religious service, or as a "walk with God," or as a
group of denominations. There are probably as many different
definitions of the Christian term "Evangelical" and
"Evangelicalism" as there are Evangelical Christian
congregations.5
In short, the meaning of "evangelical Christian"
depends on who is using it and for what purpose. The one
thing that no accepted definition of evangelical Christians
includes is the use of government to impose their beliefs on
others. It may be true that some who seek and obtain power in
government describe themselves as evangelical Christians. It
may also be true that some seek to use the power of
government to favor their religion over others.6 However, it
is equally true that many evangelical Christians are
suspicious of government involvement in their personal
affairs, including their religious practices.
One example is a friend of mine since childhood...
To continue reading
Request your trial