Tenth Circuit Summaries
Publication year | 2004 |
Pages | 155 |
Citation | Vol. 33 No. 9 Pg. 155 |
2004, September, Pg. 155. Tenth Circuit Summaries
Vol. 33, No. 9, Pg. 155
The Colorado Lawyer
September 2004
Vol. 33, No. 9 [Page 155]
September 2004
Vol. 33, No. 9 [Page 155]
From the Courts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Tenth Circuit Summaries
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Tenth Circuit Summaries
Summaries of selected opinions appear on a space-available
basis. The summaries are prepared for the Colorado Bar
Association by Jenine Jensen and Catherine Campbell, licensed
Colorado attorneys. The summaries of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit are provided as a service by
the Colorado Bar Association and are not the official
language of the Court. The Colorado Bar Association cannot
guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the summaries
Full copies of the Tenth Circuit decisions are available on
the CBA website at http: //www.cobar.org/hotlinks.cfm (United
States Courts link to the Tenth Circuit). Call The Colorado
Lawyer Editorial Offices with questions: (303) 860-1118
Discretion to Grant Downward Departure - Diminished Capacity
- Mental and Emotional Conditions - Circumventing Limitations
of § 5K2.13
U.S. v. Sheehan, No. 03-4239, 6/15/04, D.Utah, Judge
Anderson
Defendant appeals the district court's failure to
recognize its discretion to depart downward, and requests a
remand for an evidentiary hearing on the departure motion. He
pled guilty to one Hobbs Act violation and two counts of
using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence.
Defendant's motion for a downward departure was based on
a defense expert's report that defendant suffered from
acquired brain injury and seizure and mood disorders. The
motion was denied, and the district court sentenced defendant
to 441 months in prison.
The Tenth Circuit Court affirms, holding that it does have
jurisdiction to consider this appeal. The district court
unambiguously stated that it lacked authority to depart,
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, in any circumstances based on a
defendant's claim of diminished capacity. The Court is
construing U.S.S.G. § 5H1.3 (mental and emotional conditions
not ordinarily relevant in determining sentence except as
"other grounds for departure"); § 5K2.0 (grounds
for departure); and § 5K2.13 (diminished capacity may warrant
downward departure, with certain exceptions, one of which
applies here). It rejects defendant's argument, because
at the sentencing hearing he was invoking § 5K2.0 merely as a
means of circumventing the limitations of § 5K2.13. Other
Circuit Courts also have held that the prohibitions in §
5K2.13 cannot be circumvented by applying § 5K2.0 instead.
The sentencing court can order a departure based on a
defendant's mental or emotional condition, pursuant to §
5K2.0. However, its application is not based on a
defendant's claim of diminished capacity. Instead, it is
based on some other argument related to the defendant's
mental or emotional condition. The district court properly
concluded that it lacked discretion to depart downward under
§ 5K2.0 based on diminished capacity, when such a departure
was prohibited by the terms of § 5K2.13. The sentence is
affirmed.
Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction - Excusable Neglect -
Filing of Notice of Appeal - Excuse for Late Filing
U.S. v. Torres, Nos. 03-2182 & 03-2241, 6/16/04, D.N.M.,
Judge Hartz.
Defendant pled guilty to a drug offense, and reserved his
right to appeal the district court's denial of his motion
to suppress. He did not file a notice of appeal until after
the ten-day period for filing a criminal appeal, set forth in
Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(1), had passed. The case was partially
remanded to the district court for it to assess whether the
delay...
To continue reading
Request your trial