Taxable Subsidiaries and Tax-exempt Entities Who Love Them: Reviewing the Affair
Publication year | 2004 |
Pages | 59 |
Citation | Vol. 33 No. 5 Pg. 59 |
2004, May, Pg. 59. Taxable Subsidiaries and Tax-Exempt Entities Who Love Them: Reviewing the Affair
Vol. 33, No. 5, Pg. 59
The Colorado Lawyer
May 2004
Vol. 33, No. 5 [Page 59]
May 2004
Vol. 33, No. 5 [Page 59]
Specialty Law Columns
Business Law Newsletter
Taxable Subsidiaries and Tax-Exempt Entities Who Love Them Reviewing the Affair
by Sherri D. Way
Business Law Newsletter
Taxable Subsidiaries and Tax-Exempt Entities Who Love Them Reviewing the Affair
by Sherri D. Way
This column is sponsored by the CBA Business Law Section to
apprise members of current information concerning substantive
law. It focuses on business law topics for the Colorado
practitioner, including, but not limited to, issues
surrounding anti-trust, bankruptcy, business entities
commercial law, corporate counsel, financial institutions
franchising, nonprofit entities, securities law, and small
business entities.
Column Editors:
David P. Steigerwald of Sparks Willson Borges Brandt &
Johnson, P.C., Colorado Springs - (719) 475-0097,
dpsteig@sparkswillson.com; Troy Keller, senior attorney at
Qwest, (303) 992-6167, troy.keller@qwest.com
Sherri D. Way
About The Author:
This month's article was written by Sherri D. Way,
Denver, a partner in the law firm of Krendl Krendl Sachnoff
& Way, P.C., where she specializes in corporate,
insurance, and securities law, frequently advising nonprofit
entities regarding for-profit ventures - (303) 629-2600,
SDW@krendl. com. A version of this article first appeared in
Association Management Magazine (April 2002).
Tax-exempt entities often create taxable subsidiaries to meet
multiple needs. This article addresses various tax, business,
and legal issues that a tax-exempt organization should
consider relative to for-profit ventures in an increasingly
regulated environment.
Over the past several years, there has been significant
interest by tax-exempt organizations in creating for-profit
subsidiary entities. Although much of this activity has
involved trade associations, other tax-exempt entities are
evaluating such restructurings with increasing frequency.
Motivating factors often include the goals of generating
revenues, sharing in profitable ventures, and providing
additional community services in view of shrinking
governmental support. Tax-exempt entities also contemplate
creating for-profit subsidiaries for such reasons as
protecting themselves from potential liabilities and spinning
off activities unrelated to their tax-exempt purpose.
This article addresses typical business considerations
involved in a decision to pursue ventures with for-profit
subsidiaries. Additionally, it discusses how tax-exempt
entities contemplating a change in business activities should
consider the numerous legal and tax issues that may arise
with such a change. This article also discusses the structure
for for-profit subsidiary endeavors, which can be fraught
with pitfalls, particularly if the proposed activities
involve the offering of Internet services or insurance,
securities, or other financial products.
Tax Considerations and Business Activities
The prudent nonprofit should carefully consider the business
activities in which the tax-exempt entity is engaged or in
which it contemplates becoming engaged. As a threshold issue,
Internal Revenue Code ("Code" or "IRC")1
§§ 511 through 515 impose tax on income of tax-exempt
organizations if the income is determined to be unrelated
trade or business taxable income.
Nonetheless, engaging in a business activity does not in
itself subject the tax-exempt organization to unrelated
business income tax ("UBIT"). Instead, the
determination requires a detailed analysis of the business
activity involved and a careful evaluation of whether this
activity will contribute to achieving the entity's exempt
purpose.2
The contemplated business activity must significantly
contribute to the purpose of the tax-exempt organization. In
the case of trade associations, such activity must benefit
the industry as a whole, as opposed to benefiting individual
members. If the contemplated business activity does not meet
such criteria, the nonprofit organization will be subject to
UBIT on revenues generated from the activity unless an
exception applies.3 Further, the nonprofit organization may
risk disqualification as a tax-exempt entity if the unrelated
business activity becomes substantial in comparison to the
nonprofit entity's tax-exempt purpose.4
It often can be difficult to determine how certain business
activities impact the purpose of a tax-exempt entity.
Speculating as to whether particular activities will further
the entity's exempt purpose can be counterintuitive. For
example, a tax-exempt museum's operation of a parking
facility for patrons has been deemed consistent with its
charitable mission, even though the general public also was
permitted to use the facility.5
It may be prudent for tax-exempt entities to conduct certain
business activities through subsidiaries. If such
subsidiaries are properly organized and operated, the
nonprofit parent likely will be shielded from the loss of its
tax-exempt status as a result of the business conducted by
the subsidiary.6 Assuming corporate formalities are observed,
the parent entity also will enjoy insulation from the legal
liabilities of its for-profit subsidiary.
Structural Considerations And Choice of Entity
Determining the best structure for a for-profit activity
requires evaluation of several factors, including the tax,
accounting, and regulatory implications.7 The activity could
be conducted either directly in the tax-exempt entity or
indirectly, through a separate partnership, limited liability
company ("LLC"), or corporation. Each of these
entities may offer its own alternative forms, such as limited
or general partnerships. The entities also might be combined
in some fashion. For example, a nonprofit entity considering
a joint venture relationship with a for-profit entity to
develop an Internet portal might consider forming a corporate
subsidiary that would enter into a partnership, LLC, or joint
venture relationship with the for-profit entity.
It is not possible to generalize as to which structure is
best. In every situation, each legal structure must be
evaluated on its own merits. However, the most common
structure for spinning off a for-profit activity is a regular
(or "C") corporation. The primary advantage of a C
corporation is that for-profit activities are insulated from
the tax-exempt purposes of the parent organization, assuming
there are no "piercing-the-corporate-veil" issues.
This avoids the necessity of dealing with unrelated business
taxable income issues in the tax-exempt parent, and also
ensures that the activities of the for-profit subsidiary will
not jeopardize the parent's tax-exempt status.8
Moreover, dividends paid by the for-profit corporate
subsidiary normally will not be taxed to the parent as
unrelated business taxable income.9 Consequently, there will
be only one level of tax on the profits of the
subsidiary's activities, instead of a double tax (once at
the corporate level and again at the shareholder level) that
is typically imposed on corporate profits.
In some instances, the creation of a taxable subsidiary may
not be warranted. A tax-exempt organization that will engage
only in passive, low-risk activities and generate only
royalty income not subject to UBIT10 may not justify the
formation of a subsidiary of any type (assuming the entity is
not concerned with its ability to insulate itself from
liability as a result of these activities). Conducting
business in a for-profit subsidiary in such an instance
would, in fact, subject revenue to UBIT that otherwise may be
excluded.
Conversely, a...
To continue reading
Request your trial