Disciplinary Opinions
Publication year | 2004 |
Pages | 125 |
Citation | Vol. 33 No. 1 Pg. 125 |
2004, January, Pg. 125. Disciplinary Opinions
Vol. 33, No. 1, Pg. 125
The Colorado Lawyer
January 2004
Vol. 33, No. 1 [Page 125]
January 2004
Vol. 33, No. 1 [Page 125]
From the Courts
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Disciplinary Opinions
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Disciplinary Opinions
The Colorado Supreme Court has adopted a series of changes to
the attorney regulation system, including the establishment
of the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, pursuant
to C.R.C.P. 251.16. The Court also made extensive revisions
to the rules governing the disciplinary process, repealing
C.R.C.P. 241 et seq., and replacing those rules with C.R.C.P
251 et seq. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge presides over
attorney regulation proceedings and issues orders together
with a two-member hearing board at trials and hearings. The
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence apply to
all attorney regulation proceedings before the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge. See C.R.C.P. 251.18(d)
The Colorado Lawyer publishes the summaries and full-text
Opinions of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Roger L
Keithley, and a two-member hearing board, whose members are
drawn from a pool appointed by the Supreme Court. For space
purposes, accompanying Exhibits may not be printed.
These Opinions may be appealed in accordance with C.R.C.P.
251.27.
The full-text Opinions, along with their summaries, are
available on the CBA home page at
http://www.cobar.org/tcl/index.htm. See page 140 for
details.Opinions, including Exhibits, and summaries are also
available on LexisNexisTM at http://www.lexis.com/research by
clicking on States LegalU.S./Colorado/Cases and Court
Rules/By Court/Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary Opinions.
Case Number: 03PDJ024
Complainant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Respondent:
JOHN S. DUNSMOOR
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
BEFORE THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE
October 24, 2003
REPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTION
Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Roger L. Keithley,
and Hearing Board Members Gail C. Harriss and David A.
Helmer, both members of the bar.
SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY DISBARRED
A Sanctions Hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.15(b) was held
on October 23, 2003, before the Hearing Board consisting of
the Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ") and two
Hearing Board Members, Gail C. Harriss and David A. Helmer,
both members of the bar. James C. Coyle, Deputy Regulation
Counsel, represented the People of the State of Colorado
("People"). John S. Dunsmoor, the respondent,
("Dunsmoor") appeared by telephone.
The Colorado Supreme Court immediately suspended Dunsmoor
from the practice of law in Colorado in Case No. 03SA102 on
April 21, 2003. The suspension was based upon a March 17,
2003, Petition for Immediate Suspension filed by the People
based on the same factual basis giving rise to these
proceedings. The People filed a Complaint in this
disciplinary matter on April 16, 2003. The Citation and
Complaint were sent via regular and certified mail to the
respondent on the same date. The People filed a Proof of
Service on May 21, 2003. The Proof of Service shows that the
Citation and the Complaint were sent to both Dunsmoor's
registered business address and his registered home address.
In addition, the Citation and Complaint were also sent to a
recently discovered home address, as well as to Dunsmoor at
the Florence, Colorado, federal prison camp. Dunsmoor failed
to file an Answer to the complaint. Dunsmoor did submit a
letter dated May 29, 2003, which did not admit or deny any
allegation contained in the Complaint, but could be
considered as a written statement of mitigation. The Hearing
Board accepts such document (Exhibit D to the People's
Motion for Default) as a written statement for mitigation
purposes only.
On June 5, 2003, the People moved for default on the claims
set forth in the Complaint. Copies of the Motion for Default
were sent to Dunsmoor at his home and prison camp addresses.
Dunsmoor did not oppose the People's Motion for Default.
On July 14, 2003, the PDJ granted the Motion for Default as
to the facts set forth in the Complaint, which were deemed
admitted, and as to the claims set forth in the Complaint,
which were deemed established. The PDJ directed that the
matter be set for a trial/sanctions hearing. Copies of the
PDJ's Order Re: Default were sent to Dunsmoor at his home
and prison camp addresses.
The matter was originally scheduled for September 23, 2003,
but continued to October 14, 2003. At Dunsmoor's request,
the October 14, 2003, hearing date was vacated and the matter
was then rescheduled for October 23, 2003, at 9:00 a.m.
At the Sanctions Hearing Dunsmore openly acknowledged that
his conduct required disbarment and apologized to the court
for his misconduct. The Hearing Board considered the facts
established by the entry of default, the People's
argument and Dunsmoor's statement, and made the following
findings of fact which were established by clear and
convincing evidence.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
John S. Dunsmoor has taken and subscribed the oath of
admission, was admitted to the bar of the Colorado Supreme
Court on October 16, 1981, and is registered upon the
official records of the Supreme Court, registration number
11247. He is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court
pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.1(b).
All factual allegations set forth in the Complaint were
deemed admitted by the entry of default, and therefore are
established by clear and convincing evidence. The entry of
default also deemed established the violations of the Rules
of Professional Conduct set forth therein.
On May 2, 2002, Dunsmoor was charged in a one-count criminal
information in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Indiana. The information from the
Northern District of Indiana charged the respondent with a
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 664 (1994), embezzling funds of
employee pension and welfare benefit plans.
On May 22, 2002, Dunsmoor was charged in a one-count
information filed in the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado. The information from the District of
Colorado charged the respondent with a violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1957 (1994), money laundering.
On June 21, 2002, Dunsmoor pled guilty to both of the above
charges. Dunsmoor filed a written factual basis for the plea
of guilty to both charges in the federal criminal matters on
May 2, 2002.
Dunsmoor provided the following factual basis for the 18
U.S.C. § 664 violation, embezzling funds of employee pension...
To continue reading
Request your trial