Felony Sex Offender Sentencing
Publication year | 2004 |
Pages | 11 |
2004, December, Pg. 11. Felony Sex Offender Sentencing
Vol. 33, No. 12, Pg. 11
The Colorado Lawyer
December 2004
Vol. 33, No. 12 [Page 11]
December 2004
Vol. 33, No. 12 [Page 11]
Articles
Felony Sex Offender Sentencing
by Phil Cherner
by Phil Cherner
This article was written by Philip Cherner, a sole
practitioner in Denver, emphasizing criminal defense and
attorney grievance defense - (303) 860-7686
phil@philcherner.com; www.phil cherner.com
This article discusses the provisions that govern adult
felony sex offender sentencing and the Colorado Sex Offender
Lifetime Supervision Act. The Standards of the Sex Offender
Management Board also are covered, as well as conditions of
probation
Plaintiff Heather Wesp sought tort damages against her mother
and stepfather, Cheryl and Frank Brewer, alleging that Frank
Brewer had sexually abused her. Criminal charges were also
filed based on the same allegations. After writing letters
denying the accusations, both Brewers committed suicide.1
One of the most traumatic events with which lawyers have to
cope is a sex offense allegation. Whether the client is
accused of having been a sexual perpetrator or the client is
a possible victim of sexual abuse, the level of trauma to
which the client will be exposed is beyond mere
quantification. This article summarizes the various
provisions that govern adult felony sex offender sentencing
today. A large part of the statutory scheme is the Colorado
Sex Offender Lifetime Supervision Act of 1998
("Act"),2 which radically changed the philosophy of
Colorado sex offender sentencing.
Unless otherwise noted, this article covers the Act as
amended through 2004. In 2002, the General Assembly
recodified much of the felony criminal sentencing scheme.
There were minimal, if any, substantive changes, but numerous
provisions were renumbered.3 More than six years of
experience with the Act have provided perspective and
appellate interpretation, making this a good time to assess
its workings.
It is not uncommon for allegations of sexual assault to arise
during divorce proceedings, dependency and neglect actions,
and domestic violence investigations. Therefore, some
knowledge of the Act's workings should assist a wide
variety of practitioners. This article discusses the
Act's provisions and implementations, as well as the
sentencing options for adult felony sex offenders who are not
sentenced under the Act. Because the treatment for offenders
on probation and parole is the same for both categories of
offenders, the article also summarizes the various treatment
regimens.4
BACKGROUND OF THE ACT
Prior to November 1, 1998, sex offenders were most frequently
sentenced under the general felony sentencing statute5 and,
in rare cases, under the Colorado Sex Offenders Act of 1968
("1968 Act").6 The 1990s saw the evolution of
treatment programs for sex offenders on probation and in
prison. The Act can be seen as a culmination of this trend.
The Act wholly abrogates the 1968 Act and imposes lifetime
supervision for the more serious sex offenders, whether the
offender has been sentenced to probation or to prison.
The policy behind the Act is summarized in its legislative
declaration:
The general assembly hereby finds that the majority of
persons who commit sex offenses, if incarcerated or
supervised without treatment, will continue to present a
danger to the public when released from incarceration and
supervision. The general assembly also finds that keeping all
sex offenders in lifetime incarceration imposes an
unacceptably high cost in both state dollars and loss of
human potential. The general assembly further finds that some
sex offenders respond well to treatment and can function as
safe, responsible, and contributing members of society, so
long as they receive treatment and supervision. The general
assembly therefore declares that a program under which sex
offenders may receive treatment and supervision for the rest
of their lives, if necessary, is necessary for the safety,
health, and welfare of the state.7
To provide some idea of how the Act is applied, the next
section first sets out the types of crimes that are covered
by the Act and the law covering life and consecutive/
concurrent sentences.
Types of Crimes
In Colorado, felonies are divided into six classes, with
class 1 felonies being the most serious.8 Felony sex offenses
are effectively broken down into three categories. The first,
for which the Act requires a lifetime sentence, are the most
common class 2, 3, and 4 "sex offenses."9
A second group is the so-called "economic" sex
crimes, such as trafficking in children, for which the
Act's lifetime sentencing is not automatic.10 Before the
Act can be applied to these economic sex crimes, the court
must find that the defendant is likely to commit sexual
assault, unlawful sexual contact, sexual assault on a child,
or sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust.
The court also must find that a victim was a stranger to the
offender or a person with whom the offender established or
promoted a relationship primarily for the purpose of sexual
victimization.11
A third group of sex felonies is excluded from the Act's
coverage altogether. These are primarily class 5 and 6
felonies. An example is attempt or conspiracy to commit a
class 4 felony sex offense (such as an attempt to commit
sexual assault without force), which is therefore statutorily
defined as a class 5 felony.12
Generally, if the offense is covered by the Act, the court
must impose a life prison sentence or lifetime probation.
Persons who commit sex offenses not covered by the Act are
sentenced to a determinant sentence of years, rather than a
range, in the same manner as for other felonies.13 The
Colorado Court of Appeals has rejected all constitutional
challenges to the Act. Due process, equal protection,
separation of powers, cruel and unusual punishment, and Fifth
Amendment attacks were denied in People v. Oglethorpe,14
among other cases.
Life Prison Sentences
A court that imposes a life prison sentence is commanded to
sentence the offender to "at least" the minimum in
the presumptive range, to life. The presumptive range for the
offense is defined in the general felony sentencing
statute.15 For a class 4 felony, for example, the minimum in
the presumptive range is two years. Thus, the sentence for
the sex offense has to be at least two years to life. The
phrase "at least" was interpreted literally in
People v. Smith.16 Under this case, there is apparently no
upper limit to the minimum. For this example, therefore, the
sentence could be two years to life, fifty years to life, or
ninety-nine years to life. The "top" end of the
indeterminate sentence must, as required by the Act, be
natural life, meaning the offender will be imprisoned forever
unless paroled.17
Unlike all other felons, a defendant sentenced to prison
under the Act must serve 100 percent of the minimum sentence,
less any earned time deductions, before the parole board may
give initial consideration to releasing the offender to
parole.18 Earned time cannot exceed 25 percent of the
sentence.19 When an offender is parole-eligible, the parole
board must consider releasing the defendant to parole, but it
may reject the application. In fact, so far, it has rejected
every parole application under the Act since its inception in
1998.20
Consecutive/Concurrent Sentences
Presumably, the pre-existing body of law dealing with
consecutive and concurrent sentences applies to sentencing
under the Act. Thus, under the Act, the court has discretion
to impose either type of sentence, unless constrained by a
specific statutory provision.21 The Act does state:
Any sex offender sentenced pursuant to subsection (1) or (4)
[of CRS § 18-1.3-1004] and convicted of one or more
additional crimes arising out of the same incident as the sex
offense shall be sentenced for the sex offense and such other
crimes so that the sentences are served consecutively rather
than concurrently.22
In People v. Becker,23 for example, the court held that a
forty-eight-year to life sentence under the Act and a
consecutive eight-year sentence for burglary was within the
trial court's discretion.
PROBATION AND
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Not all sex offenders are sent to prison; in fact, it has
been estimated that two out of every three sex offenders are
sentenced to probation. The Act authorizes probation for
roughly the same group of individuals who were
probation-eligible before its passage. On the other hand,
offenders convicted of a crime of violence and habitual
offenders must be sent to prison.
If probation is ordered, it must be for an indeterminate term
of from ten years to life for a class 4 felony and from
twenty years to life for class 2 and 3 felonies. Intensive
supervised probation is required.24 Offenders not sentenced
under the Act are generally eligible for probation, provided
their criminal history is not a bar.25
Residential community corrections placement also is
authorized, but only as a condition of probation.26 By and
large, however, the community boards and halfway houses are
not willing to take sex offenders.
This section first discusses the Sex Offender Management
Board ("SOMB") and the evaluations required of sex
offenders by the SOMB. It then discusses the conditions of
probation.
Sex Offender
Management Board
Management Board
Although the SOMB was not created as part of the Act in 1998
(it preceded this legislation), it is charged with
promulgating standards for the evaluation and treatment of
sex offenders.27 Pursuant to its authority, the SOMB has
promulgated the Colorado SOMB Standards and Guidelines for
the...
To continue reading
Request your trial