Tenth Circuit Summaries
Publication year | 2004 |
Pages | 145 |
Citation | Vol. 33 No. 4 Pg. 145 |
2004, April, Pg. 145. Tenth Circuit Summaries
Vol. 33, No. 4, Pg. 145
The Colorado Lawyer
April 2004
Vol. 33, No. 4 [Page 145]
April 2004
Vol. 33, No. 4 [Page 145]
From the Courts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Tenth Circuit Summaries
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Tenth Circuit Summaries
Summaries of selected opinions appear on a space-available
basis. The summaries are prepared for the Colorado Bar
Association by Jenine Jensen and Catherine Campbell, licensed
Colorado attorneys. The summaries of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit are provided as a service by
the Colorado Bar Association and are not the official
language of the Court. The Colorado Bar Association cannot
guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the
summaries.
Full copies of the Tenth Circuit decisions are available on the CBA website at http: //www.cobar.org/hotlinks.cfm (United States Courts link to the Tenth Circuit). Call The Colorado Lawyer Editorial Offices with questions: (303) 860-1118
Full copies of the Tenth Circuit decisions are available on the CBA website at http: //www.cobar.org/hotlinks.cfm (United States Courts link to the Tenth Circuit). Call The Colorado Lawyer Editorial Offices with questions: (303) 860-1118
Americans with Disabilities Act - Remand to State Court -
Fraudulent Joinder - Independent Federal Jurisdiction -
Breathing is Major Life Activity - Substantially Limits
Ability - Reasonable Accommodation - Interactive Process -
Failure to Mitigate
Albert v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc., No
02-2052, 01/29/04, D.N.M., Judge Murphy
Plaintiff suffered from asthma, which limited her activities.
She was employed by defendant ("Smith's") for
several years, but as her asthma worsened, she requested a
transfer to a position that would accommodate her condition.
She was not reassigned. She sued in a state court, claiming
that Smith's had violated New Mexico state law, and that
two Smith's employees had interfered with her employment
relationship. Smith's removed the case to federal court
and requested that the individual employees be dismissed
because they had been joined fraudulently to destroy
diversity. The plaintiff then amended her complaint to add a
claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act
("ADA"). Several months after suit was filed,
Smith's offered to reinstate plaintiff to a position that
would accommodate her asthma, but she did not accept the
offer before it expired. The district court dismissed the
individual defendants and granted summary judgment in
Smith's favor on all claims.
The Tenth Circuit Court holds that the federal court had
federal-question jurisdiction after plaintiff added her ADA
claim. Therefore, dismissal of the individual defendants on
the ground of fraudulent joinder was improper. Also,
dismissing them on the merits was inappropriate because the
reason for dismissing them was based on jurisdiction.
Therefore, the individual defendants should have been
dismissed without prejudice.
Turning to plaintiff's ADA claim, the Tenth Circuit Court
holds that her asthma substantially limits her ability to
breathe, which is a major life activity. The Court also
determines that plaintiff could establish her disability by
evidence of her own experience, rather than in comparison to
most people's daily lives. Plaintiff's...
To continue reading
Request your trial