Disciplinary Opinions
Publication year | 2004 |
Pages | 141 |
Citation | Vol. 33 No. 4 Pg. 141 |
2004, April, Pg. 141. Disciplinary Opinions
Vol. 33, No. 4, Pg. 141
The Colorado Lawyer
April 2004
Vol. 33, No. 4 [Page 141]
April 2004
Vol. 33, No. 4 [Page 141]
From the Courts
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Disciplinary Opinions
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Disciplinary Opinions
The Colorado Supreme Court has adopted a series of changes to
the attorney regulation system, including the establishment
of the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, pursuant
to C.R.C.P. 251.16. The Court also made extensive revisions
to the rules governing the disciplinary process, repealing
C.R.C.P. 241 et seq., and replacing those rules with C.R.C.P
251 et seq. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge presides over
attorney regulation proceedings and issues orders together
with a two-member hearing board at trials and hearings. The
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence apply to
all attorney regulation proceedings before the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge. See C.R.C.P. 251.18(d).
The Colorado Lawyer publishes the summaries and full-text Opinions of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Roger L Keithley, and a two-member hearing board, whose members are drawn from a pool appointed by the Supreme Court. For space purposes, accompanying Exhibits may not be printed.
These Opinions may be appealed in accordance with C.R.C.P 251.27.
The full-text Opinions, along with their summaries, are available on the CBA home page at http://www.cobar.org/tcl/index.htm. See page 156 for details.Opinions, including Exhibits, and summaries are also available on LexisNexisTM at http://www.lexis.com/research by clicking on States LegalU.S./Colorado/Cases and Court Rules/By Court/Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary Opinions.
The Colorado Lawyer publishes the summaries and full-text Opinions of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Roger L Keithley, and a two-member hearing board, whose members are drawn from a pool appointed by the Supreme Court. For space purposes, accompanying Exhibits may not be printed.
These Opinions may be appealed in accordance with C.R.C.P 251.27.
The full-text Opinions, along with their summaries, are available on the CBA home page at http://www.cobar.org/tcl/index.htm. See page 156 for details.Opinions, including Exhibits, and summaries are also available on LexisNexisTM at http://www.lexis.com/research by clicking on States LegalU.S./Colorado/Cases and Court Rules/By Court/Colorado Supreme Court Disciplinary Opinions.
Case Number: 03PDJ063
Petitioner:
JOHN PHILIP MCDONNELL, JR.
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE BEFORE
THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE
January 23, 2004
OPINION AND ORDER READMITTING JOHN PHILIP
MCDONNELL, JR. TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW
MCDONNELL, JR. TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW
Opinion issued by a Hearing Board consisting of Presiding
Officer Gail C. Harriss, and Barbara Weil Laff, both members
of the bar, and Melinda M. Harper, a representative of the
public.
ATTORNEY READMITTED TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW
On December 11, 2003, a readmission hearing was held pursuant
to C.R.C.P. 251.29(a) before a Hearing Board consisting of
the Presiding Officer Gail C. Harriss, a member of the bar,
and two hearing board members, Melinda M. Harper, a
representative of the public and Barbara Weil Laff, a member
of the bar. Alexander R. Rothrock represented John P.
McDonnell, Jr. ("McDonnell"). James S. Sudler,
Assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel, represented the People
of the State of Colorado (the "People"). The
following witnesses testified on behalf of McDonnell: Sheryl
S. Branney, Michael E. Canges, Francine S. Salazar, Laurinda
L. McDonnell, Michael H. Gendel, M.D., Mark L. Held, Ph.D.,
and Andrew F. Czopek, Ph.D. McDonnell also testified on his
own behalf. McDonnell's exhibits 1 through 6 were
admitted into evidence.
The Hearing Board considered the testimony and exhibits
admitted as well as a Stipulation signed by the parties;
addressed the credibility of the witnesses; and made the
following findings of fact, which were established by clear
and convincing evidence.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
John Philip McDonnell, Jr. took the oath of admission and was
admitted to the bar of the State of Colorado on October 21,
1981. The Supreme Court accepted the parties' Conditional
Admission of Misconduct and disbarred McDonnell from the
practice of law in Colorado on June 19, 1995, effective on
that date. People v. McDonnell, 897 P.2d 829, 830 (Colo.
1995).
After graduating from law school in 1981, McDonnell was
employed by a small firm until 1986, when he decided to open
his own law practice. His firm enjoyed moderate success and a
growing clientele. His wife joined the firm upon her
graduation from law school in 1987. McDonnell moved the firm
to a larger office and hired staff. A change in policy by one
of the firm's main clients resulted in a sudden decrease
in firm revenue.
During this time, McDonnell turned increasingly to alcohol to...
To continue reading
Request your trial