From the Wool-sack
Publication year | 2003 |
Pages | 77 |
Citation | Vol. 32 No. 10 Pg. 77 |
2003, October, Pg. 77. From The Wool-Sack
Vol. 32, No. 10, Pg. 77
The Colorado Lawyer
October 2003
Vol. 32, No. 10 [Page 77]
October 2003
Vol. 32, No. 10 [Page 77]
Departments
From The Wool-Sack
From The Wool-Sack
by Christopher R Brauchli
From The Wool-Sack
From The Wool-Sack
by Christopher R Brauchli
Chris Brauchli practices law in the firm of Hutchinson Black
& Cook LLC in Boulder, Colorado. He can be reached at
brauchli.56@post.harvard.edu
You cannot possibly have a broader basis for any
government than that which includes all the
people with all their rights in their hands, and
with an equal power to maintain their rights
government than that which includes all the
people with all their rights in their hands, and
with an equal power to maintain their rights
William Lloyd Garrison
It all makes perfect sense until you think about it
That's how a lot of things are in the Bush world. The
most recent example came from Mark Quinlivan, a lawyer in the
Ashcroft Justice Department. He addressed the annual meeting
of the American Bar Association held in August in San
Francisco. Individuals invited to speak are supposed to say
something interesting. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony
Kennedy demonstrated how that is done
Addressing the group on August 9, 2003, Justice Kennedy told
the lawyers that too many people are imprisoned in the United
States. He pointed out that one American in 143 is
incarcerated, compared with one in 1,000 in many European
countries. He called for the repeal of mandatory-minimum
sentences for federal crimes saying: "Our resources are
being misspent. Our punishments are too severe. Our sentences
are too long." He said mandatory minimum sentences can
produce "harsh and unjust" results.
Justice Kennedy's comments were thoughtful and
thought-provoking. They provided a nice contrast to the
comments of Mark Quinlivan, who propounded the preposterous
to the assembled lawyers. Quinlivan told the assembly that
people in California who voted to legalize marijuana for
medical use were exactly like the people in the South in the
middle of the twentieth century who espoused segregation.
Until Quinlivan spoke, it is safe to say, that thought had
occurred to no one outside the Ashcroft Justice Department.
It is that kind of creative, if somewhat antediluvian,
anti-Republican thinking that has distinguished that
department under Attorney General Ashcroft.
The concept Quinlivan propounded was antediluvian because of
its content, and anti-Republican because Republicans claim to
dislike it when the federal government tells...
To continue reading
Request your trial