Admissibility of Prior Felony Convictions for Impeachment Purposes
Jurisdiction | Colorado,United States |
Citation | Vol. 32 No. 11 Pg. 79 |
Pages | 79 |
Publication year | 2003 |
2003, November, Pg. 79. Admissibility of Prior Felony Convictions for Impeachment Purposes
Vol. 32, No. 11, Pg. 79
The Colorado Lawyer
November 2003
Vol. 32, No. 11 [Page 79]
November 2003
Vol. 32, No. 11 [Page 79]
Specialty Law Columns
Civil Evidence
Admissibility of Prior Felony Convictions for Impeachment Purposes
by Richard F. Rodriguez
Civil Evidence
Admissibility of Prior Felony Convictions for Impeachment Purposes
by Richard F. Rodriguez
This month's article was written by Richard F. Rodriguez
Denver, an associate with Holme Roberts & Owen LLP -
(303) 861-7000
Those interested in submitting an article for publication in
Civil Evidence should contact the editor, Lawrence M
Zavadil, at (303) 389-4644 or lzavadil@jcfkk.com.
Q: In a civil action, must a court admit evidence of a
previous felony conviction of a party witness?
A: Yes, if the evidence is offered to attack or impeach the
witness's credibility, and the previous felony conviction
occurred less than five years before the witness testifies.
Assumed Facts
Tom Trouble was an accountant employed by the ABC Corporation
("ABC"). During an independent audit, an auditor
found some discrepancies in Trouble's accounting
practices. The auditor ultimately determined that Trouble had
been using corporate funds to finance personal vacations and
make other purchases.
ABC sued Trouble for, among other things, civil theft. At the
trial management conference, ABC stated that it would attempt
to introduce evidence that Trouble had been convicted of
felony forgery four and one-half years earlier. At the end of
the conference, for reasons related to another witness's
unavailability, the court continued the trial for
approximately nine months. Thus, the trial was scheduled to
be held more than five years after Trouble's felony
conviction.
At trial, ABC attempted to introduce the evidence of
Trouble's prior felony conviction. Trouble's attorney
objected, claiming that the evidence was inadmissible because
it had been more than five years since the conviction
occurred.
Analysis
CRS § 13-90-101 defines generally who shall be competent to
testify at trials.1 Furthermore, in every case, the
credibility of a witness may be attacked. This includes
questioning the witness's credibility because of a prior
felony conviction.2 The conviction can be based on a guilty
plea,3 regardless of whether a sentence was imposed.4 The
conviction may be used even though an appeal is pending.5
Generally...
To continue reading
Request your trial