Some Random Thoughts on Brief Writing
Publication year | 2003 |
Pages | 29 |
Citation | Vol. 32 No. 1 Pg. 29 |
2003, January, Pg. 29. Some Random Thoughts On Brief Writing
Vol. 32, No. 1, Pg. 29
The Colorado Lawyer
January 2003
Vol. 32, No. 1 [Page 29]
January 2003
Vol. 32, No. 1 [Page 29]
Departments
Judges' Corner
Some Random Thoughts On Brief Writing
by Robert J. Kapelke
Judges' Corner
Some Random Thoughts On Brief Writing
by Robert J. Kapelke
Robert J. Kapelke is a Judge with the Colorado Court of
Appeals
Yale Professor Fred Rodell once put it quite nicely
"There are two things wrong with almost all legal
writing. One is its style. The other is its content."
There it is in a nutshell
As for the style issue, part of our problem is that we remain
mired in the Middle Ages. Even today, lawyers and judges
draft court orders stating, "THE COURT DOTH HEREBY
DECREE." "Doth"? Which court is that, by the
way - the court of Henry VIII?
Here is a remarkable nugget of legalese that actually found
its way into a Colorado appellate brief: "At a point in
time immediately subsequent to the termination of the
aforesaid altercation on the above described premises, the
defendant-appellant removed himself from the aforementioned
locus and repaired to a situs on the premises immediately
adjacent thereto." A plain English translation of that
sentence comes out something like this: "After the
fight, defendant went next door."
A tip to the appellate brief writer is simply to "write
with your ear." Read your draft aloud to yourself or at
least read it through in your mind. If neither you nor any
anyone you know would ever utter a sentence like the one you
have written, head back to the drawing board. Some of the
most effective brief writing is simply straightforward and
conversational.
Say It Short and Sweet
Most appellate and trial judges favor briefs that are concise
and precise - short and to the point. A direct style better
persuades and holds the reader's attention than the
discursive ramble. By the same token, the citation of a case
or two directly on point clinches an argument more readily
than a full page of string cites to cases barely in the
ballpark. The judges will read each word of the key
authorities, but the chances of their devouring the entire
fruit of your exhaustive research are not as great. The law
clerk is more likely to draw that assignment.
Tell Us a Tale
Good storytelling is a sound technique in brief writing, as
in oral advocacy. Sometimes, the story can be captured in a
few evocative words. Here...
To continue reading
Request your trial