Court Business
Publication year | 2002 |
Pages | 127 |
Citation | Vol. 31 No. 5 Pg. 127 |
2002, May, Pg. 127. Court Business
Vol. 31, No. 5, Pg. 127
The Colorado Lawyer
May 2002
Vol. 31, No. 5 [Page 127]
May 2002
Vol. 31, No. 5 [Page 127]
From the Courts
Court Business
Court Business
Court Business
Court Business
Colorado Supreme Court Rules of Evidence Committee
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 33, C.R.E
Rules 103(a), 404(a), 803(6), and 902
Proposed Amendments to C.R.E
ARTICLE VII, OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY
Rules 701, 702, 703
Notice of Public Hearing, June 14, 2002
Written Comments Due May 31, 2002
The Colorado Supreme Court will conduct a public hearing on
Proposed Amendments to Rule 103(a): Rulings on Evidence; Rule
404(a): Character Evidence Not Admissible To Prove Conduct
Exceptions; Other Crimes; Rule 803(6): Hearsay Exceptions;
Availability of Declarant Immaterial; Rule 902:
Self-Authentication; Rule 701: Opinion Testimony By Lay
Witnesses; Rule 702: Testimony By Experts: Committee Comment
on Amended Colorado Rule 702; and Rule 703: Bases Of Opinion
Testimony By Experts.
The public hearing will be held on Friday, June 14, 2002, at
3:00 p.m. in the Colorado Supreme Court Courtroom, 2 E. 14th
Ave., Denver, Colorado. An original and eight copies of
written comments are to be submitted to: Mac V. Danford,
Clerk of the Supreme Court, 2 E. 14th Ave., Denver, CCO
80203-2115, by 5:00 p.m., May 31, 2002. Persons wishing to
participate in the hearing should notify Mac Danford no later
than May 31, 2002.
Note: Additions are underlined.
PROPOSED
Rule 103. Rulings On Evidence
(a) Effect of Erroneous Ruling. Error may not be predicated
upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a
substantial right of the party is Affected, and
(1) Objection. In case the ruling is one admitting evidence,
a timely objection or motion to strike appears of record,
stating the specific ground of objection, if the specific
ground was not apparent from the context; or
(2) Offer of Proof. In case the ruling is one excluding
evidence, the substance of the evidence was made known to the
court by offer or was apparent from the context within which
questions were asked.
Once the court makes a definitive ruling on the record
admitting or excluding evidence, either at or before trial, a
party need not renew an objection or offer of proof to
preserve a claim of error for appeal.
PROPOSED
Rule 404. Character Evidence Not Admissible To Prove Conduct;
Exceptions; Other Crimes
(a) Character Evidence Generally. Evidence of a person's
character or a trait of his character is not admissible for
the purpose of proving that he acted in conformity therewith
on a particular occasion, except:
(1) Character of Accused. Evidence of a pertinent trait of
his character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to
rebut the same or if evidence of the alleged victim's
character for aggressiveness or violence is offered by...
To continue reading
Request your trial