Opinions
Publication year | 2002 |
Pages | 119 |
Citation | Vol. 31 No. 2 Pg. 119 |
2002, March, Pg. 119. Opinions
Vol. 31, No. 2, Pg. 119
The Colorado Lawyer
March 2002
Vol. 31, No. 3 [Page 119]
March 2002
Vol. 31, No. 3 [Page 119]
From the Courts
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Opinions
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Opinions
Case Number: 01PDJ071
Petitioner
RODERIC A. CARUCCI
Respondent
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.
January 4, 2002
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE BEFORE THE
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE
ORDER RE: REINSTATEMENT PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.29(j)
Opinion by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Roger L.
Keithley and Hearing Board members Frances L. Winston, a
member of the public, and Frederick Y. Yu, a member of the
bar.
ATTORNEY REINSTATED
This reinstatement matter was heard on November 7, 2001,
pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.29(b) and (c) before the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ") and two hearing board
members, Frances L. Winston, a member of the public, and
Frederick Y. Yu, a member of the bar. Gregory G. Sapakoff,
Assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel, represented the People
of the State of Colorado (the "People") and Roderic
A. Carucci ("Carucci") appeared pro se. Terry
Thomas testified on behalf of Carucci, who also testified on
his own behalf. Carucci's exhibits 1, 2 and 3 were
admitted into evidence by stipulation.
The PDJ and Hearing Board reviewed the Petition for
Reinstatement and Response thereto, considered the testimony
and exhibits admitted, assessed the credibility of the
witnesses, and made the following findings of fact which were
established by clear and convincing evidence.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
The misconduct giving rise to Carucci's suspension arose
from a reciprocal discipline action brought pursuant to
C.R.C.P. 251.21 from the State of Nevada. On March 8, 1999
the Supreme Court of Nevada entered an order suspending
Carucci from the practice of law for three months and imposed
upon Carucci a fine of $5,000. In re: Discipline of Roderic
A. Carucci, No. 32494 (Nev. 1999), 1999 Nev. LEXIS 22.
Carucci's suspension arose out of his creating duplicate
false tax returns which grossly overstated his income for the
years 1992 and 1993, and submitting them to a lender in order
to secure a large loan for the purchase of a yacht.
Subsequently, Carucci attempted to deceive the Northern
Nevada Disciplinary Panel while under oath by not telling the
truth while under examination....
To continue reading
Request your trial