When the Developer Controls the Homeowner Association Board: the Benevolent Dictator?
Publication year | 2002 |
Pages | 91 |
2002, January, Pg. 91. When the Developer Controls the Homeowner Association Board: The Benevolent Dictator?
Vol. 31, No. 1, Pg. 91
The Colorado Lawyer
January 2002
Vol. 31, No. 1 [Page 91]
January 2002
Vol. 31, No. 1 [Page 91]
Specialty Law Columns
Construction Law Forum
When the Developer Controls the Homeowner Association Board The Benevolent Dictator?
by Ronald M. Sandgrund, Joseph F. Smith
Construction Law Forum
When the Developer Controls the Homeowner Association Board The Benevolent Dictator?
by Ronald M. Sandgrund, Joseph F. Smith
This article discusses the potential conflicts of interest
and liabilities a real estate developer faces when it acts as
builder, vendor, declarant, and property manager for a
Colorado common interest community, such as a multi-family
development, and potential solutions to these problems
This month's article was written by Ronald M. Sandgrund
Greenwood Village, a partner with Vanatta, Sullan, Sandgrund
& Sullan, P.C. - (303) 779-0077, and Joseph F. Smith,
Greenwood Village, an associate with Vanatta, Sullan,
Sandgrund & Sullan, P.C. - (303) 779-0077.
A real estate developer may experience potential conflicts of
interest and liabilities when it acts in different capacities
- for example, builder, vendor, declarant, and property
manager - for a Colorado common interest community
("CIC"), such as a multi-family development.
Possible solutions to some of these difficulties (none fully
satisfactory) are explored below.
Conflicts come into sharp focus if suspected construction
defects begin to manifest themselves during the period the
developer controls the community association's board.
During this time, capitalism confronts socialism in the form
of a for-profit business assuming management and control
over, along with the legal responsibilities of, a
not-for-profit homeowner association board.
In one case, a creative settlement valued at over $10 million
was reached after several years of bitter litigation that
pitted neighbor against neighbor. The situation escalated
when a developer-controlled board allegedly failed to
properly investigate and remedy slope stability and fill
problems affecting the community's road system.
Ultimately, a class action suit was certified against several
board members and the declarant-developer who appointed them.
These board members also controlled or managed the affairs of
the declarant-developer. The declarant-developer allegedly
was responsible for the defective condition of the roads and
various claimed misrepresentations and nondisclosures
accompanying the sale of lots in the community when acting in
its capacity as developer-vendor.
Colorado's Common
Interest Ownership Act
Interest Ownership Act
Colorado's Common Interest Ownership Act, CRS §§
38-33.3-101 et seq. ("CCIOA"), enacted by the
General Assembly in 1992, was intended to provide a
"clear, comprehensive, and uniform framework for the
creation and operation of common interest communities."1
CCIOA is the embodiment of a legislative effort to promote
planned communities, which the General Assembly determined
was critical to the "continuation of the economic
prosperity of Colorado."2
CCIOA attempts to establish a balance between developer and
homeowner interests. For example, CCIOA: (1) provides for the
strengthening of homeowner associations by, among other
things, giving associations the power to sue on behalf of the
individual unit owners who make up the community; (2) serves
to promote "effective and efficient property management
through defined operational requirements that preserve
flexibility" for homeowner associations; and (3) gives
"developers flexible development rights with specific
obligations within a uniform structure of development of a
common interest community that extends through the transition
to owner control."3 These "specific
obligations" may create legal trouble for the developer,
particularly during the period that the developer controls
the association's board.
Developer's Role During Period of Declarant
Control
Control
CCIOA describes the role typically occupied by the developer
of a CIC as that of "declarant." A declarant is any
person or group of persons acting in concert who: (1) as part
of a common promotional plan, offers to dispose of to a
purchaser such declarant's interest in a unit not
previously disposed of to a purchaser; or (2) reserves or
succeeds to any special declarant right.4 A declarant may
have one or more "affiliates" - namely, "any
person who controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with a declarant." A successor affiliate of a
special declarant is subject to the same obligations imposed
by CCIOA on the declarant.5
CCIOA grants a declarant, through a written and recorded
declaration,6 the power to provide for a "period of
declarant control," during which time the declarant, or
persons designated by the declarant, may appoint and remove
the officers and members of the executive board.7 The period
of declarant control begins no later than the date the first
unit in the CIC is conveyed to a purchaser. Unless required
by the terms of the declaration to terminate sooner, the
period of declarant control lasts until: (1) no later than
either sixty days after conveyance of 75 percent of the units
to unit owners other than the declarant; (2) two years after
the last conveyance of a unit by the declarant in the
ordinary course of business; or (3) two years after any right
to add new units was last exercised.8
The rights and responsibilities of the developer during the
period of declarant control are clearly set forth in CCIOA,9
while related provisions prohibit or limit a declarant's
ability to modify these rights and responsibilities. Except
as expressly provided in CCIOA, the provisions of the statute
"may not be varied by agreement," and rights
conferred by CCIOA "may not be waived."
Additionally, a declarant may not use any device to evade the
limitations or prohibitions of CCIOA or the declaration. A
court may limit the application of any contractual clause
relating to a CIC to avoid an unconscionable result. Every
contract or duty governed by CCIOA imposes an obligation of
good faith in its performance or enforcement. Finally, any
officers and members of the executive board of the
association who are appointed by the declarant are required
to exercise the care of fiduciaries toward the unit owners.10
Declarant's Potential
Liabilities as Developer, Builder, and Vendor
Liabilities as Developer, Builder, and Vendor
When a developer also acts as builder and vendor of CIC
housing units, three areas of the developer's commercial
activities may create potential liability for construction
defects: (1) marketing, (2) sales, and (3) construction.
Serious conflicts of interest can arise if the developer also
effectively assumes the duties of the community's board.
As a matter of law, the developer effectively becomes the
advocate for and guardian of the unit owners' interest in
the condition and performance of the community's common
elements.
Marketing Activities
Like any other builder-vendor, a developer-builder has a duty
to disclose all material facts known to it that "in
equity and good conscience should be disclosed" when
marketing a CIC.11 This duty may arise under the common
law,12 or pursuant to state or federal statute.13
Intentional misrepresentation and concealment are actionable
against a developer-builder.14 Negligent misrepresentation is
another potential basis for a developer's liability
arising from its marketing practices. Colorado recognizes the
tort of negligent misrepresentation in two circumstances: (1)
where the negligent providing of false information causes
physical harm to the plaintiff's person or property;15
and (2) where the negligent providing of false information
occurs during the course of a business transaction causing
financial loss.16
A nondisclosure or omission also can constitute a
misrepresentation.17 Thus, the negligent omission of material
information also can be actionable.18 The duty of care owed
by the supplier of information is measured by the use to
which the information will be put, weighed against the
magnitude and probability of loss that might attend that use
if the information proves to be incorrect or incomplete.19
Developer-builders also face potential liability under both
state and federal statutes. Colorado's Soils and Hazard
Analyses of Residential Construction Act20 requires every
developer or seller to provide to the purchaser of a new
residence, including a unit in a CIC, a copy of a summary
report of the property's "analysis" and
"site recommendations" no later than fourteen days
before closing. Where a...
To continue reading
Request your trial