Estate Administrative Expenses and the Personal Representative
Publication year | 2000 |
Pages | 69 |
Citation | Vol. 29 No. 9 Pg. 69 |
2000, September, Pg. 69. Estate Administrative Expenses and the Personal Representative
Vol. 29, No. 9, Pg. 69
The Colorado Lawyer
September 2000
Vol. 29, No. 9 [Page 69]
September 2000
Vol. 29, No. 9 [Page 69]
Specialty Law Columns
Estate and Trust Forum
Estate Administrative Expenses and the Personal Representative
by Harmon S. Graves
Estate and Trust Forum
Estate Administrative Expenses and the Personal Representative
by Harmon S. Graves
Reluctant to surrender any federal fisc to probate courts
federal courts have closely examined the personal
representative?s decision to sell assets during
administration when an administrative expense deduction is
claimed on an estate tax return. An assault on the validity
of the applicable regulation1 imposing a standard of
"necessity"2 not found in 26 U.S.C. § 2053(a) has
failed.3 Therefore, personal representatives are confronted
with the axiom that, when dealing with the government on tax
matters, they "must turn square corners to achieve
literal compliance"4 with 26 U.S.C. § 2053 and related
regulations. However, the route is marked so that some
rounded corners may be taken to meet deductibility
requirements
This article addresses estate tax return deductibility of
administrative expenses incurred in the sale of assets by the
fiduciary during administration. The author concludes that a
refusal by a beneficiary to accept a distribution in kind may
qualify a sale of assets as necessary to effect distribution
of the estate, which otherwise might be assailed as a sale
for the individual benefit of a beneficiary and therefore may
be nondeductible
Applicable Statute and Regulations
IRC § 2053(a) provides, in pertinent part:
. . . For purposes of the tax imposed by section 2001, the
value of the taxable estate shall be determined by deducting
from the value of the gross estate such amounts . . . for
administrative expenses . . . as are allowable by the laws of
the jurisdiction, whether within or without the United
States, under which the estate is being administered.
No definition of "administrative expenses" is given
in IRC § 2053, but reference is made to expenses that are
allowable under applicable state law. Colorado recognizes
expenses of administration as claims of the second class5
that are permitted under the Allowance of Claims statute.6
Moreover, the personal representative is authorized to engage
persons to perform specialized services in the administration
of the estate for reasonable compensation.7
It is clear, however, outside the Seventh Circuit,8 that
notwithstanding the straightforward language of IRC § 2053,
allowability under state law of administrative expenses
associated with the sale or property held by the personal
representative alone will not satisfy deductibility
requirements on the estate tax return.9 Treas. Reg. §
20.2053-3 requirements also must be met. In pertinent part,
this regulation provides:
Deduction for expenses of administering estate.
(a) In general. The amounts deductible from a decedent?s
gross estate as ?administration expenses? . . . are limited
to such expenses as are actually and necessarily incurred in
the administration of the decedent?s estate; that is, in the
collection of assets, payment of debts, and distribution of
property to the persons entitled to it. . . .
(d) Miscellaneous administration expenses. . . .
(2) Expenses for selling property of the estate are
deductible if the sale is necessary in order to pay the
decedent?s debts, expenses of administration, or taxes, to
preserve the estate, or to effect distribution. The phrase
"expenses for selling property" includes brokerage
fees and other expenses attending the sale. . . .
From the Commissioner?s construction of "administrative
expenses" through this regulation, a two-part test for
deductibility has emerged.
Two-Part Test for Deductibility
First, the expenses must be allowable as administrative
expenses under the applicable state probate law. Second, such
expenses must include only those actually and necessarily
incurred in the administration of the decedent?s estate.10 As
one court observed, "[T]he state law may be relied upon
as a guide to what deductions may reasonably be permitted for
federal estate tax purposes."11 Another court observed
that deductibility is "ultimately a question of federal
law."12
Under Treas. Reg. § 20-2053-1(b)(2), a...
To continue reading
Request your trial