Opinions
Jurisdiction | Colorado,United States |
Citation | Vol. 29 No. 10 Pg. 123 |
Pages | 123 |
Publication year | 2000 |
2000, October, Pg. 123. Opinions
Vol. 29, No. 10, Pg. 123
The Colorado Lawyer
October 2000
Vol. 29, No. 10 [Page 123]
October 2000
Vol. 29, No. 10 [Page 123]
From the Courts
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Opinions
Colorado Disciplinary Cases
Opinions
The Colorado Supreme Court has adopted a series of changes to
the attorney regulation system, including the establishment
of the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, pursuant
to C.R.C.P. 251.16, and a new intermediate appellate entity
known as the Appellate Discipline Commission, pursuant to
C.R.C.P. 251.24. The Court also made extensive revisions to
the rules governing the disciplinary process, repealing
C.R.C.P. 241 et seq., and replacing those rules with C.R.C.P
251 et seq. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge presides over
attorney regulation proceedings and issues orders together
with a two-member hearing board at trials and hearings. The
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence apply to
all attorney regulation proceedings before the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge. See C.R.C.P. 251.18(d)
Beginning with the September 1999 issue, The Colorado Lawyer
will publish the summaries and full-text opinions of the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge, Roger L. Keithley, and a
two-member hearing board, whose members are drawn from a pool
appointed by the Supreme Court, and the opinions of the
Appellate Discipline Commission
These Opinions may be appealed in accordance with C.R.C.P.
251.26 and C.R.C.P. 251.27.
The full-text opinions, along with their summaries, are
available on the CBA homepage at
http://www.cobar.org/tcl/index.htm. See page 131 for details.
Case No. 99PDJ033
(consolidated with 99PDJ066 and 99PDJ126)
(consolidated with 99PDJ066 and 99PDJ126)
The People of the State of Colorado,
Complainant,
v.
Michael P. Andersen,
Respondent.
July 21, 2000
Original Proceeding in Discipline before the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge
OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS
Opinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and
Hearing Board members Madeline A. Collison and Kathleen M.
O?Brien, both members of the bar.
SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY DISBARRED
This matter was heard on January 11, 2000, before the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ") and two
hearing board members, Madeline A. Collison and Kathleen M.
O?Brien, both members of the Bar. Debora D. Jones, Assistant
Regulation Counsel, represented the People of the State of
Colorado ( the "People") and David C. Little
appeared on behalf of Michael P. Andersen
("Andersen") who was also present. The People?s
Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 and Andersen?s Exhibit A were admitted
into evidence by stipulation. The PDJ and Hearing Board heard
testimony from the People?s witnesses Patricia M. Marrison
and Mary Lynn Elliott, and from Andersen?s witness Jay
Michael Stranges. Andersen testified on his own behalf.
Two disciplinary matters pending against Andersen ? Case No.
99PDJ066 and Case No. 99PDJ033 ? were consolidated on
November 16, 1999. Shortly before trial, the parties elected
to consolidate Case No. 99PDJ126 into the other two matters
so that all pending matters against Andersen could be
addressed at the same hearing.1
Default had previously entered in both Case No. 99PDJ033 and
Case No. 99PDJ066. Upon Andersen?s motion, by Order dated
January 4, 2000, the PDJ set aside the default in Case No.
99PDJ033. At the commencement of the hearing, Andersen moved
that the PDJ also set aside the default in Case No. 99PDJ066.
The People did not object; accordingly the PDJ set aside the
default in Case No. 99PDJ066 and accepted respondent?s Answer
filed in all three matters.2
The PDJ and Hearing Board considered the exhibits and
argument, the testimony of the witnesses, assessed the
credibility of the witnesses, and made the following findings
of fact which were established by clear and convincing
evidence:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
Andersen has taken and subscribed the oath of admission, was
admitted to the bar of the Colorado Supreme Court on October
15, 1992, and is registered upon the official records of the
Court, attorney registration number 22139. He is subject to
the jurisdiction of this court pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.1(b).
A. Case No. 99PDJ033
(1) The Trust Account Checks
Andersen met M. Patricia Marrison ("Marrison") in
the summer of 1997. At the time he was suffering from
depression. Andersen worked for Marrison?s law firm in
Colorado Springs, Colorado from July 1997 until February 16,
1999. Marrison acted as a mentor to Andersen. For a short
period of time she allowed him to occupy a basement apartment
in her home. Marrison considered Andersen to be a friend.
From September 1998 to February 1999, because of a dispute
with another of Marrison?s employees, Andersen worked for
Marrison from his home.
By early 1999, Andersen was using alcohol and cocaine. On
February 17, 1999, Andersen left Colorado Springs, Colorado.
At the time, he intended to have one final fling in Las Vegas
before he committed suicide. Prior to leaving Colorado,
Andersen took three checks from Marrison?s law firm trust
account checkbook without her knowledge or authority. He
removed the checks from a section of the checkbook where they
would not be readily noticed. Andersen placed Marrison?s
signature on the checks using a signature stamp. Andersen was
aware at the time he used the stamp that he did not have
Marrison?s authority to do so. On February 17, 1999, Andersen
negotiated one of the checks for $3,400. The check was drawn
on the Marrison law office trust account which contained only
client funds. Andersen knew the funds in that account did not
belong to him. On February 22, 1999, Marrison?s office
received a call from a Las Vegas business requesting
authorization to cash a trust account check for Andersen in
the amount of $750. Marrison declined to authorize the
payment, and examined the trust account checkbook and the
trust account statements. She discovered that $3,400 had been
withdrawn from the bank and that checks were missing from the
trust account checkbook. She stopped payment on the missing
checks.3
At the time Andersen took the $3,400 from the trust account,
Marrison was experiencing a period of personal financial
hardship of which Andersen was aware. Andersen has not yet
repaid the $3,400 to the trust account.
(2) Incidents of Failing to Appear
In September 1996, Andersen failed to appear at the
arraignment of his client Michael Edward Mock although he was
aware of the scheduling. Neither Andersen nor his client
appeared for the rescheduled arraignment in October 1996.
Consequently, an arrest warrant was issued for Andersen?s
client.
Also in September 1996, Andersen entered his appearance in a
criminal action on behalf of defendant S. J. Andersen failed
to appear for the trial in December and again at the
rescheduled trial date in February 1997. The court issued a
contempt citation against Andersen for failing to appear.
Andersen appeared for the contempt hearing and the court
assessed fines and costs against him. After several
resettings, the trial was set in May 1997 and Andersen again
failed to appear to represent his client. Andersen?s client ?
who was a juvenile ? proceeded without counsel.
In June 1997, Andersen failed to appear at a preliminary
hearing on behalf of his client Christopher Ming Yuan.
Andersen?s failure to appear resulted in the issuance of a
contempt citation against him. Andersen failed to appear for
the contempt hearing.
Also in June 1997, Andersen failed to appear for the
arraignment of his client Buck Juanito Whatley. The court
reset the arraignment and, on the same date, scheduled a
hearing on a show cause order the court issued against
Andersen for failing to appear. Andersen again failed to
appear.
C. Case No. 99PDJ126
On March 15, 1999, while using alcohol, Andersen took a 1994
Pontiac Firebird automobile from a dealership in Las Vegas,
Nevada, and drove the car to Los Angeles, California. At the
time he took the vehicle he understood the car did not belong
to him. The car was reported as stolen and Andersen was
arrested and jailed by the Los Angeles police department. On
April 9, 1999, Andersen pled no contest to a violation of the
Cal. Vehicle Code § 10851(a) (West 2000), taking a vehicle
without the owner?s consent, a felony. Andersen was placed on
formal probation for a period of three years, was ordered to
serve thirty-eight days and was given credit for time served.
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Amended Complaint in Case No. 99PDJ033 alleges that
Andersen violated § 18-5-102(1)(c), 6 C.R.S. (1999)(forgery)
by knowingly using Marrison?s signature stamp to endorse
checks on Marrison?s law office trust account, and that
Andersen violated § 18-4-401, 6 C.R.S. (1999)(theft) by
knowingly taking trust account checks and using one of them
to withdraw $3,400 from the trust account without
authorization. The Amended Complaint further alleges that
Andersen?s violation of these statutory provisions provided
grounds for discipline pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.5, 44 C.R.C.P.
251.5(b), and also violates Colo. RPC 8.4(b) 5 and Colo. RPC
8.4(c).
Colorado Revised Statutes § 18-5-102, 6 (1999) provides:
(1) A person commits forgery, if, with intent to defraud,
such person falsely makes, completes, alters, or utters a
written instrument which is or purports to be, or which is
calculated to become or to represent if completed:
(c) A deed, will, codicil, contract, assignment, commercial
instrument, promissory note, check, or other instrument which
does or may evidence, create, transfer, terminate, or
otherwise affect a legal right, interest, obligation, or
status;6
The facts set forth in 99PDJ033 establish that Andersen
engaged...
To continue reading
Request your trial