The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act: Part Ii
Publication year | 2000 |
Pages | 81 |
Citation | Vol. 29 No. 10 Pg. 81 |
2000, October, Pg. 81. The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act: Part II
Vol. 29, No. 10, Pg. 81
The Colorado Lawyer
October 2000
Vol. 29, No. 10 [Page 81]
October 2000
Vol. 29, No. 10 [Page 81]
Specialty Law Columns
Family Law Newsletter
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act: Part II
by Angela R. Arkin
Family Law Newsletter
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act: Part II
by Angela R. Arkin
As discussed in Part I of this article, which appeared in the
September 2000 issue,1 the National Conference of
Commissioners on Uniform State Laws ("NCCUSL")
drafted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement
Act ("UCCJEA" or "the Act") to bring the
Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act ("UCCJA")2
into compliance with the Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act
("PKPA"),3 and to simplify procedures for
enforcement of interstate parenting time orders. The UCCJEA
was introduced in Colorado in 2000.4
The Colorado version of the UCCJEA, House Bill 1262, is
effective for all "causes of action" filed on or
after July 1, 2000.5 The passage of the UCCJEA in Colorado is
intended to improve the lives of Colorado parents with
out-of-state children and the lives of Colorado children with
out-of-state parents
Part I of this article provided an overview of the history of
and significant changes to the UCCJEA, described Part 1 of
the Act, and briefly discussed Part 4 of the Act. This
article covers the establishment, enforcement, and
modification of rules in interstate custody cases, as
contained in Parts 2 and 3 of the UCCJEA
UCCJEA?Part 2
Jurisdiction
The drafters of the UCCJEA wanted to remove any possibility
of two states separately deciding that each had jurisdiction
over a child and subsequently issuing independent parental
responsibility orders. The UCCJEA initially grants the home
state sole power to exercise or defer jurisdiction in
interstate "child custody determinations." If the
child?s home state did not make the determination of
jurisdiction initially, the UCCJEA disallows enforcement of
the resulting order under UCCJEA?Part 3. Note that UCCJEA §§
201 through 204 define jurisdiction substantially differently
than the jurisdictional sections of the UCCJA and PKPA
UCCJEA § 201, entitled "Initial Child-Custody
Jurisdiction," sets forth three bases for Colorado
jurisdiction in an initial "child custody
proceeding": (1) Colorado is the child?s home state; (2)
there is no home state, or the home state has declined to
exercise jurisdiction, and the child has a significant
connection with Colorado and substantial information is
available about the child in Colorado; or (3) all other
states with jurisdiction have declined to exercise it in
favor of Colorado.6 The "home state" specifically
is designated as the priority basis for jurisdiction. The
home state has the exclusive right to choose whether or not
to exercise jurisdiction before any other state can exercise
jurisdiction. Bases for jurisdiction other than home state
can be used only after initial action by the home state
declining jurisdiction, or if the child has no home state, as
defined under the Act.
UCCJEA § 202 sets forth the continuing jurisdiction of
Colorado as the issuing state, if the initial order was
entered properly under the Act or under PKPA. If the order
was entered appropriately initially, jurisdiction continues
in Colorado unless
(a) A court of this state determines that the child, the
child?s parents, and any person acting as a parent do not
have a significant connection with this
state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child?s care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or
state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child?s care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or
(b) A court of this state or a court of another state
determines that the child, the child?s parents, and any
person acting as a parent do not presently
reside in this state.7
reside in this state.7
A clear difference exists between jurisdiction in an initial
child custody proceeding, governed under UCCJEA § 201, and
jurisdiction in a modification proceeding under UCCJEA § 203
In a Colorado modification proceeding, if Colorado did not
issue the initial order, the other "issuing state"
first must determine whether or not it has, or chooses to...
To continue reading
Request your trial