Preface
Publication year | 2000 |
Pages | 5 |
Citation | Vol. 29 No. 10 Pg. 5 |
2000, October, Pg. 5. Preface
Vol. 29, No. 10, Pg. 5
The Colorado Lawyer
October 2000
Vol. 29, No. 10 [Page 5]
October 2000
Vol. 29, No. 10 [Page 5]
Hot Topics In Employment Law
Preface
by John M. Husband, David H. Stacy
by John M. Husband, David H. Stacy
Explosive growth in the labor and employment areas of
practice has affected Colorado attorneys not only as
professionals but as employers as well. This issue of The
Colorado Lawyer focuses on several hot topics in employment
law, featuring articles of interest to both
lawyer-practitioners and employers. These articles are
described briefly below
John M. Husband, David H. Stacy
Co-Editors
We are all faced with the advent of and adjustment to new
technology. This is particularly true in the workplace. When
this technology intersects with rules and regulations
established in a blue-collar industrial environment, the
results are not always predictable. In his article dealing
with the impact of employer rules limiting employee e-mail
and Internet use, Michael Josserand examines how the National
Labor Relations Board may review these issues in the context
of union organizational activities. The second article
authored by Andy Low, discusses whether and to what extent
employers may monitor the electronic and voicemail
communications of its employees. Low’s analysis
includes consideration of both the federal Electronic
Communications Privacy Act and the common law on this issue
Kristina James and Todd McNamara examine the validity of
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC")
procedures regarding timely issuance of notices of right to
sue. The authors provide a detailed analysis of a recent
decision that impacts the EEOC’s practice of
issuing notices of right to sue to employees prior to the
expiration of the 180-day statutory period for EEOC
investigation and conciliation. In a departure from prior
circuit court decisions on the issue, the D.C. Circuit held
that the early termination of the EEOC’s
investigatory process, and the regulation authorizing it,
directly contradict Title VII’s express direction
to the EEOC to investigate all charges. The authors analyze
the applicable case law and regulatory framework on this
issue and provide valuable practical advice to attorneys who
handle employment discrimination cases.
The important issue of a discharged employee’s duty
to mitigate economic losses in employment cases...
To continue reading
Request your trial