Pesky Citations
Publication year | 2000 |
Pages | 33 |
Citation | Vol. 29 No. 3 Pg. 33 |
2000, March, Pg. 33. Pesky Citations
Vol. 29, No. 3, Pg. 33
The Colorado Lawyer
March 2000
Vol. 29, No. 3 [Page 33]
March 2000
Vol. 29, No. 3 [Page 33]
Departments
The Scrivener: Modern Legal Writing
Pesky Citations
by K. K. DuVivier
C 2000 K.K. DuVivier
The Scrivener: Modern Legal Writing
Pesky Citations
by K. K. DuVivier
C 2000 K.K. DuVivier
Constant citation to legal authorities presents a unique
problem for legal writers. Although these authorities are
necessary to the analysis, integrating them can interrupt the
flow of the writing, or more significantly, can obscure the
meaning. Law reviews have chosen to use footnotes to address
this problem. But footnotes create their own form of vertical
interruption,1 and many courts discourage their use in
briefs. This article addresses some of the difficulties
created by these pesky citations and suggests some solutions
for incorporating them more smoothly
Full Citations in Sentences
The Bluebook requires a full citation the first time you
address any legal authority.2 A problem arises, however, if
the first time you cite is at the beginning or in the middle
of a sentence. Such a citation makes the sentence cumbersome
and interrupts the subject and verb flow. A better
alternative is to move the citation to the end of the
sentence. Another solution is to start with a sentence that
introduces the case, so that you can get the full citation
out of the way at the end, in a separate citation sentence
After giving a full citation, you may then, in the next
sentence, reference the case by name only.3
Example: In Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 1107
S.Ct. 2775, 97 L.Ed. 144 (1987), the United States Supreme
Court held that the proponent of evidence falling within the
co-conspirator hearsay exception need not demonstrate the
unavailability of the declarant
Revision: The United States Supreme Court has addressed the
co-conspirator hearsay exception. Bourjaily v. United States,
483 U.S. 171, 107 S.Ct. 2775, 97 L.Ed. 144 (1987). In
Bourjaily, the Court held that the proponent of evidence
falling within the exception need not demonstrate the
unavailability of the declarant.
Two Citations in One Sentence
Citations create additional difficulties when more than one
proposition, and thus more than one supporting authority, is
addressed in the same sentence. Instead of listing two
authorities at the end of the sentence, which might create
some ambiguity about which source...
To continue reading
Request your trial