Formal Opinion 104: Surrender of Papers to the Client Upon Termination of the Representation
Publication year | 1999 |
Pages | 53 |
Citation | Vol. 28 No. 7 Pg. 53 |
1999, July, Pg. 53. Formal Opinion 104: Surrender of Papers to the Client Upon Termination of the Representation
Vol. 28, No. 7, Pg. 53
The Colorado Lawyer
July 1999
Vol. 28, No. 7 [Page 53]
July 1999
Vol. 28, No. 7 [Page 53]
Departments
CBA Ethics Committee Formal Opinions
Formal Opinion 104: Surrender of Papers to the Client Upon Termination of the Representation
CBA Ethics Committee Formal Opinions
Formal Opinion 104: Surrender of Papers to the Client Upon Termination of the Representation
The following Formal Opinion was written by
the Ethics Committee of the Colorado Bar Association
the Ethics Committee of the Colorado Bar Association
[Formal Ethics Opinions are issued for advisory purposes only
and are not in any way binding on the Colorado Supreme Court
the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, the Attorney Regulation
Committee, or the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel and
do not provide protection against disciplinary actions.]
104 Surrender of Papers to the Client Upon Termination of the
Representation
Adopted April 17, 1999
Adopted April 17, 1999
Introduction and Scope
The CBA Ethics Committee has received numerous inquiries
concerning the responsibility of the lawyer to surrender
papers and property to the client upon termination of the
representation. These inquiries generally relate to the
obligations of the lawyer to deliver the documents and
involve discussion of which papers and property the client is
entitled to receive. Such debates can be especially difficult
when the client's newly retained counsel seeks delivery
of the file from the terminated lawyer, and the steps taken
in the course of representation in the past are being
challenged or questioned. The purpose of this opinion is to
address the general obligations of lawyers to surrender the
file upon demand after termination and to discuss what does
or does not, constitute the papers and property to which the
client is entitled
This opinion does not address those situations where a lawyer
has not been fully paid and the lawyer is asserting a
retaining lien on client papers. For a discussion of the
lawyer's duties in these circumstances, see CBA Ethics
Committee Formal Opinion 82, "Assertion of
Attorney's Retaining Lien on Client's Papers"
(April 15, 1989, addendum issued, 1995).1 For purposes of
this opinion, the Committee assumes the lawyer has not
asserted a retaining lien upon the papers.
This opinion also does not address the specific obligations
of the lawyer to retain and preserve files after closure of
the representation.2 See "Coping with the Avalanche: A
Survey on the Disposition of Client Files" by Doris B.
Truhlar and Joseph N. de Raismes, 16 The Colorado Lawyer,
1787 (Oct. 1987)."3 Finally, this opinion does not
address whether and under what circumstances all or any part
of a lawyer's file may be subject to disclosure or
discovery in civil and criminal proceedings pursuant to
applicable law and rules of court.
Syllabus
The primary ethical obligation of a lawyer upon termination
of the representation is to take the steps necessary, to the
extent reasonably practicable, to protect the client's
interests. One of these steps involves the lawyer's duty
to surrender papers and property to which the client is
entitled. Lawyers consistently have been disciplined for
blanket refusals to surrender the file to the client upon
demand. Since the client may be uninformed about what is, or
is not, contained in the file, the lawyer may inquire as to
the needs of the client; however, the lawyer should
understand that it may be difficult for the client to define
what is required. Interrelated with the obligation to protect
the client's interests is the lawyer's duty to define
the client's needs liberally. In this context, the
client's entitlement is not completely defined by
traditional concepts of property and ownership. Rather, the
entitlement is based on the client's right to access the
documents related to the representation to enable continued
protection of the client's interests.
There are two primary areas in which the lawyer properly
retains papers and documents which do not constitute papers
and property to which the client is entitled. One includes
documents, used by the attorney to prepare initial documents
for the client, in which a third party, e.g., another client,
has a right to non-disclosure. A lawyer has the right to
withhold pleadings or other documents related to the
lawyer's representation of other clients that the lawyer
used as a model on which to draft documents for the present
client. However, the product drafted by the lawyer may not be
withheld.
A second area involves those documents that would be
considered personal attorney-work product, and not papers and
property to which the client is entitled. Certain documents
may be withheld: for example, internal memoranda concerning
the client file, conflicts checks, personnel assignments, and
lawyer notes reflecting personal impressions and comments
relating to the business of representing the client. This
information is personal attorney-work product that is not
needed to protect the client's interests, and does not
constitute papers and property to which the client is
entitled.
Detailed definition of this second category is difficult. The
distinction in this area is factually specific to each
situation and must be determined by the lawyer, realizing
that the lawyer has a duty to take those steps reasonably
practicable to protect the client's interests by
surrendering the necessary information. Generally, such duty
favors production. In the event that personal attorney-work
product is intertwined with information that should be
surrendered, the lawyer should produce factual information in
the form of a summary or with personal impressions redacted
if necessary. Given the variety of factual circumstances that
may arise and the fact that Colorado courts have not
addressed this area, the Committee provides its own analysis
together with a summary of authorities from other
jurisdictions, to assist the lawyer in analyzing the
particular situation which the lawyer may face. In the event
of a dispute regarding production of documents in the context
of litigation,...
To continue reading
Request your trial