An Updated Primer on Letters of Credit
Publication year | 1999 |
Pages | 5 |
1999, April, Pg. 5. An Updated Primer on Letters of Credit
Vol. 28, No. 4, Pg. 5
The Colorado Lawyer
April 1999
Vol. 28, No. 4 [Page 5]
April 1999
Vol. 28, No. 4 [Page 5]
Articles
An Updated Primer on Letters of Credit
by Beat U. Steiner
An Updated Primer on Letters of Credit
by Beat U. Steiner
This article updates an article written a dozen years ago1 to
take into account the rewriting of the law applicable to
letters of credit. In July 1996, the Colorado legislature
adopted revised Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial Code
("UCC").2 Revised Article 5, a wholesale revision
of the article, significantly updated and modernized the UCC
as it applied to letters of credit, creating greater
conformity between law and practice.3 The Uniform Customs and
Practices for Documentary Credits ("U.C.P."),4 a
convention used by bankers around the world for interpreting
and dealing with letters of credit, also has been rewritten
since the time of the original article, with some rather
significant changes. In addition, on January 1, 1999, the
International Standby Practices ("I.S.P.")5 became
effective. The I.S.P. is a statement of generally accepted
practice, custom, and usage of standby letters of credit that
has been approved by the International Financial Services
Association and the International Chamber of Commerce Banking
Commission
Letters of credit have become increasingly common in
commercial transactions far afield from their traditional
domain, the international sale of goods transaction. Their
increasing popularity in commercial transactions generally is
a function of interest rates (which at times have made
letters of credit financially more attractive than cash
deposits) and increasing awareness of their enormous
flexibility. Although shakiness in the banking industry
during the 1980s and the legal assault on the assurance of
payment under letters of credit have had an impact, they have
not significantly weakened the correct perception that
letters of credit offer one of the highest possible forms of
security.6
There is a substantial body of literature on letters of
credit generally,7 the enforceability of letters of credit
when the underlying transaction goes awry,8 and the treatment
of letters of credit in bankruptcy proceedings.9 This article
is about drafting letters of credit. It is directed to the
practitioner who does not specialize in letters of credit
but is required in the course of commercial transactions to
draft and review credits, particularly standby letters of
credit
BACKGROUND
Definition
CRS § 4-5-102(a)(10) defines a letter of credit as a
definite10 undertaking by an issuer, to a beneficiary, at the
request or for the account of an applicant,11 to honor a
documentary demand by payment or delivery of an item of value
(usually money).12 As the name implies, the undertaking is
customarily in the form of a letter from the issuer to the
beneficiary. The essence of a letter of credit is the primary
obligation of the issuer to the beneficiary to pay on behalf
of the applicant—an obligation independent of the
actual performance of the beneficiary's duties to the
applicant and dependent solely on the beneficiary's
presentation to the issuer of documents complying with the
terms of the credit.13
Like a negotiable instrument (which a letter of credit is
not),14 most of the terms and conditions of the instrument
are implied by law and do not appear in the text of the
credit.15 Applicable law for credits issued in the United
States is Article 5 of the UCC, either the original 1954
version or the 1994 revision.16 Credits also may incorporate
by express reference, custom, or usage of trade the
provisions of the U.C.P. and of the I.S.P., as well as other
banking practices.17 If the UCC applies to the letter of
credit, unless disclaimed, the standard practice of financial
institutions that regularly issue letters of credit must be
observed by the issuer.18 In addition, if the issuer is a
regulated banking institution, certain regulations will
apply.19
Under CRS § 4-5-102(a)(9), an engagement by an individual for
personal, family, or household purposes is not a letter of
credit. This rule cannot be waived by agreement.20 Moreover,
this rule does not preclude a financial institution from
issuing a letter of credit on behalf of an individual for
personal, family, or household purposes, since the individual
is not the issuer of the credit. It is possible that, in the
future, courts will set aside a circumvention of this rule as
where, for example, an individual forms a single-member
limited liability company to issue a letter of credit.
Circumstances where individuals are issuers (as opposed to
applicants) are rare enough that this rule would not appear
to limit the utility of letters of credit to any significant
degree. The existence of the rule suggests, however, that
where an individual is the issuer of a letter of credit, the
credit should expressly disclaim its use for "personal,
family or household purposes."
Types, Features, and Parties
There are various types of letters of credit. A "clean
credit" requires nothing for payment but a draft or
other demand for payment under the credit.21 A
"documentary credit," on the other hand, requires,
in addition to the making of a demand, (commonly referred to
as a "drawing"), the presentation of documents,
usually title or shipping documents, against which payments
are made. A "standby credit"22 falls into another
category, distinguished by the fact that the issuer has a
primary obligation to the beneficiary, but the credit may be
drawn on only when the applicant fails to perform its
obligation to the beneficiary. Despite the apparently
straightforward distinction between clean credits and
documentary credits, credits requiring drafts plus some
statement of the beneficiary (the usual format for standby
credits) are generally referred to as "clean
credits."
The term "unconditional" often used by lawyers in
relation to letters of credit has no legal definition. Every
credit has conditions—even a so-called
"unconditional" letter of credit requires the
presentation of a sight draft or other demand for payment on
or before the expiration date.23 Thus, it is not useful for a
contract to call for an unconditional letter of credit. The
conditions should be specified.
Letters of credit can be drafted to include various features.
For instance, they can be "revocable" or
"irrevocable." If revocable, the obligation of the
issuer can be revoked without notice to the beneficiary or
the applicant at any time. A letter of credit can be a
"straight credit," that is, for the benefit of the
beneficiary only, or a "negotiation credit," on
which the issuer will pay drafts drawn by the beneficiary to
third parties who negotiate (by endorsement) the drafts to
the issuer. Notation credits are no longer separately defined
in the UCC, but credits on which multiple drawings are
permitted may, as one of their conditions, provide that the
letter of credit be delivered to the issuer so each drawing
may be noted thereon. A credit can be
"transferable," but it is nontransferable unless
otherwise designated. These various features are discussed in
greater detail below.
Parties to a letter of credit transaction may include more
than the issuer, beneficiary, and applicant. For example,
there may be a "nominated person," a party whom the
issuer designates to pay, accept, negotiate, or otherwise
give value under a letter of credit and who is reimbursed by
the issuer.24 One common type of nominated person is a
"confirmer,"25 a person (usually a larger bank or a
bank nearer in location to the beneficiary) who undertakes to
honor a letter of credit issued by another. Confirmation also
is discussed below. Other functions of nominated persons,
including the functions of an "adviser,"26 are less
common in standby transactions and are not discussed in this
article.
The Three Contracts
A transaction involving a letter of credit usually involves
three contracts:27 (1) the business transaction between two
parties, represented by the contract between them; (2) the
letter of credit itself, involving usually, but not
necessarily, a bank as the "issuer"28 of the
credit, and one of the parties to the business transaction
who is its "beneficiary";29 and (3) the
reimbursement agreement between the issuer and the party to
the business transaction who causes the letter of credit to
be issued and who the UCC refers to as the
"applicant."30 To understand their respective
rights and obligations, the parties must remember at all
times that these three contracts are separate, distinct, and
independent of each other. When properly applied, this
"independence principle" answers many questions
relating to the rights and obligations of the parties to a
letter of credit transaction.31
The three parties in a letter of credit transaction have
joint and conflicting interests with respect to the terms of
the credit. In general terms, the beneficiary wants to get
paid no matter what happens; the applicant wants to reimburse
the issuer only if the beneficiary is entitled to the money;
and the issuer, caught in the middle (or, more accurately,
having placed itself in the middle for a fee), wants to pay
if the demand for payment is proper. The interplay of these
conflicting interests places a high premium on drafting, and
the courts have developed legal principles to protect each
party's main interest.
BASIC CONCEPTS
The Issuer's Main Interest and the
Rule of Strict Compliance
The issuer ordinarily should police a letter of credit
transaction to assure that the credit meets all of the
technical requirements. In addition, the issuer should be
sure that the credit is clear, objective, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial