Subtle Screwups: Twenty-six Ways to Sabotage an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
Publication year | 1998 |
Pages | 57 |
Citation | Vol. 27 No. 1 Pg. 57 |
1998, January, Pg. 57. Subtle Screwups: Twenty-six Ways to Sabotage an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
Vol. 27, No. 1, Pg. 57
The Colorado Lawyer
January 1998
Vol. 27, No. 1 [Page 57]
January 1998
Vol. 27, No. 1 [Page 57]
Specialty Law Columns
Estate and Trust Forum
Subtle Screwups: Twenty-six Ways to Sabotage an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
by Mark D. Masters
Estate and Trust Forum
Subtle Screwups: Twenty-six Ways to Sabotage an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
by Mark D. Masters
Your long-standing client died about two years ago. You blink
your eyes in disbelief at the latest round of discovery your
defense attorney has just sent over for you to answer. This
time it is Requests for Admission
Why have the client's adult children sued you for all
that money? Because the life insurance trust failed and the
IRS assessed the estate for a ton of taxes and penalties-but
mostly because the decedent was your client
In this Kafka-esque setting, the plaintiffs' Requests for
Admission below highlight some of the simple and not so
simple ways a personal irrevocable life insurance trust can
fail.1
Requests for Admission
1. Admit that more than one taxable lapse of a power of
withdrawal occurred during one calendar year
If the grantor's contribution was made too late in the
preceding year for the holders of powers of withdrawal to
effectively exercise or waive their Crummy power, some
portion of the grantor's contributions for the following
year may not be covered by the gift tax annual exclusion.2
Furthermore, the lapse of a withdrawal right may be a gift by
the beneficiary under Internal Revenue Code ("IRC")
§§ 2041 and 2514.
2. Admit that the trust grantors retained incidents of
ownership in the life insurance policy.
If the insured grantors actually or constructively retain any
incidents of ownership in the life insurance policy, such as
the power to change beneficiary or surrender the policy (even
if the powers were never exercised), such retention violates
IRC § 2042(2), and the full amount of the policy proceeds
will be includible in the grantor's gross estate.3 Treas.
Reg. § 20.2042-1(c)(2) gives guidance in identifying
incidents of ownership. An insured (and his or her advisors
who participate), in assigning a life insurance policy to an
irrevocable life insurance trust ("ILIT"), must be
careful not to retain any interest in the policy that might
constitute an incident of ownership.
3. Admit that you helped create a life insurance trust in
which the grantor, his spouse or other non-independent person
served as trustee.
Depending on the provisions of the trust, allowing the
insured grantor or his or her spouse to serve as trustee may
violate IRC § 2042(2) because such position is an
"incident of ownership." In all cases, an insured
should not be trustee because it will constitute a general
power of appointment.4
4. Admit that you allowed the grantor to retain string powers
over his irrevocable life insurance trust.
Although in a grey area, allowing the grantor to retain
powers under IRC §§ 2036 and 2038 to, for example, alter or
revoke the trust may cause the life insurance proceeds to be
includible in the grantor's gross estate.5 The risk of
IRS scrutiny and family ire is probably too great. However,
note that under Rev. Rul. 95-58, if the grantor retains a
power only to substitute a trustee who is not related to or
subordinate to the grantor within the meaning of IRC §
672(c), such power will not cause inclusion of the trust
assets in the grantor's gross estate.
5. Admit that you helped create and fund a life insurance
trust that was revocable by its grantor.
Allowing the grantor to retain powers under IRC § 2038 to
alter, amend, revoke, or terminate the trust or any
conveyance into the trust will cause the life insurance
proceeds to be includible in the grantor's gross estate
under IRC §§ 2036, 2038, or 2042, even if the deceased
insured retained such rights in conjunction with another.6
6. Admit that holders of powers of withdrawal lacked actual
notice of their Crummy withdrawal powers or a realistic
opportunity to exercise such powers.
To qualify a grantor's contribution for the annual
exclusion, Crummy beneficiaries must have timely notice of
their withdrawal rights and a true opportunity to exercise
their powers of withdrawal. The IRS maintains that thirty
days between notice of the withdrawal right and its lapse
constitutes a reasonable time period.7 For the annual
contribution to be a present interest gift, the beneficiary
must receive prompt and actual notice of his or her right of
withdrawal,8 or the withdrawal right will be considered
"illusory."
7. Admit that the window for withdrawal by holders of the
power to withdraw was too short.
Crummy beneficiaries must have actual notice and a true
opportunity to exercise their powers of withdrawal if grantor
contributions are to be exempt from transfer taxes. The IRS
maintains that thirty days between notice of the withdrawal
right and its lapse constitutes a reasonable time period.9
Three or four days is too short.10
8. Admit that no trust assets existed from which the trustee
could effectively satisfy any demand made by a holder of a
power of withdrawal.
If assets are available to satisfy the demand of the holder
of a power to withdraw, including the policy itself, the gift
tax annual exclusion should be available.11 However, if no
other assets exist to satisfy the withdrawal
power-holder's demand and trust provisions prohibit
withdrawal of the policy, the annual exclusion will not be...
To continue reading
Request your trial